2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robin eigenvalues on domains with peaks

Abstract: Let Ω ⊂ R N , N ≥ 2, be a bounded domain with an outward power-like peak which is assumed not too sharp in a suitable sense. We consider the Laplacian u → −∆u in Ω with the Robin boundary condition ∂nu = αu on ∂Ω with ∂n being the outward normal derivative and α > 0 being a parameter. We show that for large α the associated eigenvalues Ej(α) behave as Ej(α) ∼ −ǫj α ν , where ν > 2 and ǫj > 0 depend on the dimension and the peak geometry. This is in contrast with the well-known estimate Ej(α) = O(α 2 ) for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis is in the spirit of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, see e.g. [13,Part 3], with M ε ′ ,a being an "effective operator", and it is essentially an adaptation of the constructions of the earlier paper [9] used for the study of Robin eigenvalues in domains with peaks. We then show in Proposition 9 that the eigenvalues of Q ε are close to those of T ε , which finishes the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Scheme Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis is in the spirit of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, see e.g. [13,Part 3], with M ε ′ ,a being an "effective operator", and it is essentially an adaptation of the constructions of the earlier paper [9] used for the study of Robin eigenvalues in domains with peaks. We then show in Proposition 9 that the eigenvalues of Q ε are close to those of T ε , which finishes the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Scheme Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proof is variational and based on the min-max principle, and its main ingredient is a kind of asymptotic separation of the variables x 1 and x ′ , which is quite similar to [8]. On the other hand, the analysis in the x ′ -variable becomes much more involved and uses some results on the Robin eigenvalues of balls from the earlier paper [9]. Various proof steps are explained in greater detail in Subsection 2.3 below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a domain with a cusp, the resulting operator is not necessarily self-adjoint. If the cusp is, roughly, less sharp than quadratic, then the form is bounded from below, and the spectrum is discrete (see [16,22,24] and, e.g., [11] for a recent study of the corresponding eigenvalue sequence itself). But, as it was shown in [22,24], the nature of the problem operator may become completely different, as it may lose its semi-boundedness, if the cusp is sharper than quadratic, see also [4, § 5].…”
Section: State Of Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with the one-sided Robin problems for the Laplacian in a domain surrounded by Γ, for which the cusp is not allowed to be very sharp: see e.g. [17] for the study of the eigenvalues and [19,20] for the issues concerning the definition of the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%