2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-assisted excision of the submandibular gland by a postauricular facelift approach: comparison with the conventional transcervical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial experience is concordant with that of other authors (20), who have assured of the minimal risks of the involvement of the facial vessel package during TORS. The robot-assisted excision of the submandibular gland through a postauricular facelift approach has become a viable option to cure benign salivary disorders (including benign neoplasms) with better cosmetic outcomes (11)(12)(13)(14) as well as for the TORS for the removal of the submandibular gland (20,22). There is no mention in the literature about the postoperative occurrence of any case of facial nerve deficit, and in this regard, the facelift procedure can be considered safe with a very low risk of complications (facelift).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our initial experience is concordant with that of other authors (20), who have assured of the minimal risks of the involvement of the facial vessel package during TORS. The robot-assisted excision of the submandibular gland through a postauricular facelift approach has become a viable option to cure benign salivary disorders (including benign neoplasms) with better cosmetic outcomes (11)(12)(13)(14) as well as for the TORS for the removal of the submandibular gland (20,22). There is no mention in the literature about the postoperative occurrence of any case of facial nerve deficit, and in this regard, the facelift procedure can be considered safe with a very low risk of complications (facelift).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of conservative salivary techniques such as sialendoscopy (4)(5)(6) and sialendoscopy-assisted surgical transoral procedures (7)(8)(9) have provided a minimally invasive way of curing residual obstructing symptoms as a consequence of transcervical sialadenectomy (10). The risk of a residual unaesthetic scar has been partially solved by the so-called modified facelift or retroauricular approach; robotic surgery via modified facelift or the retroauricular route has been recently proposed for the transcervical removal of the submandibular gland (11)(12)(13)(14). Following the transoral pathway, the risk of facial nerve injury is reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für Resektionen im Bereich der Glandula submandibularis liegen bislang nur wenige Erkenntnisse zum Einsatz robotischer Systeme vor. In Einzelfällen, bei welchen das da Vinci-System für die Resektion benigner Tumoren angewandt wurden, konnten guten kosmetischen Ergebnisse erzielt werden, allerdings war auch bei dieser Anwendung die Operationsdauer im Vergleich zum herkömmlichen Vorgehen deutlich verlängert [227].…”
Section: Hypopharynxkarzinomeunclassified
“…Esta aceptación incluye de forma más generalizada que para otros abordajes, centros fuera del área de Asia-Pacífico [31]. Además de para la tiroidectomía, el abordaje retroauricular es adecuado para otras intervenciones sobre el cuello lateral como la submaxilectomía [32] o la disección ganglionar [33]. El abordaje retroauricular está teniendo en occidente un desarrollo para cirugía cervical distinta de la tiroidectomía que no habían tenido otros abordajes [34].…”
Section: Tiroidectomía Por Abordaje Retroauricularunclassified