2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00359-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic-assisted microsurgical penile replantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixteen studies had less than 10 total patients and were excluded from formal analysis (Supplemental Table 1). 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24
Figure 5 PRISMA diagram.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen studies had less than 10 total patients and were excluded from formal analysis (Supplemental Table 1). 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24
Figure 5 PRISMA diagram.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,[23][24][25] The most recent case report by Yilmaz et al claims that this was the first robotic-assisted penile transplantation report published. 26 The report describes a patient indicated for a penile amputation and consequently underwent transplantation. Full patency and penile function were achieved, and the article describes the overall results as very similar to the traditional manual microsurgical technique of penile transplantation, thus highlighting the feasibility of this robotic approach.…”
Section: Qualitative Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%