2011 IEEE 5th International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ramech.2011.6070460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic covert path planning: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the process noise covariance is ten times larger for feature 1 (upper left) than for feature 2: Q (1) = 10I, Q (2) = I. The higher noise level implies that a higher measurement rate is required to keep the state estimate of the first feature accurate, compared to the second feature.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the process noise covariance is ten times larger for feature 1 (upper left) than for feature 2: Q (1) = 10I, Q (2) = I. The higher noise level implies that a higher measurement rate is required to keep the state estimate of the first feature accurate, compared to the second feature.…”
Section: Numerical Illustrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of planning paths to minimize the exposure to adversarial observers, i.e., computing stealthy paths, has received some attention in the literature, and a survey of different approaches can be found in [1]. We will make use of binary variables to indicate whether the adversarial observer obtains measurements of the mobile sensor.…”
Section: Avoiding Adversarial Observersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study deals with multi-robot systems that traverse through the threats, while maintaining a connected formation. In [18], [19], [20], [21] a team of robots is considered in the problem of robot navigation under threats, but the robots carry out their traverses one at a time, sequentially, and do not travel in a formation.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it does not scale well to handle constraint combinations and generally can result in non‐halting behaviors and inability to solve many problems. Computing global trajectories that account for spatial constraints with respect to obstacles and other agents is still a challenging problem that is of value to the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%