Robotic Emergencies: Are You Prepared for a Disaster?

Carlos, Grace; Saulan, May

doi:10.1002/aorn.12393

Cited by 10 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Perioperative nurses, particularly nurses in the operating room and CRNAs, are vital to the successful implementation and functioning needed for the robotic surgical team (Carlos & Saulan, ). During RALS, the surgeon sits behind a console, usually in the operating room, and operates the surgical arms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Subsequently, these technologies are acquired and implemented without input from professional nurses. RALS affects the physical and interpersonal context of the surgical team's work and has generated additional responsibilities for perioperative nurses and CRNAs (Carlos & Saulan, ). Perioperative nurses are uniquely responsible for overcoming the challenges involved with new surgical technologies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic‐assisted surgery

Schuessler

Stiles

Mancuso

2019

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives To explore the perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and Certified Registered Nurse Anaesthetists (CRNAs) in robotic‐assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). The objective was to identify the factors that affect nursing care of patients who undergo robotic‐assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). Background The rapid introduction of technological innovations into the healthcare system has created new challenges for perioperative nurses. RALS affects the physical and interpersonal context of the surgical team's work and subsequent patient outcomes. Despite significant changes to the workflow for perioperative nurses and CRNAs, there is little research focusing on the nurses’ experience and their challenges with RALS. Design A qualitative descriptive study. Method Semi‐structured interview questions guided data collection. A total of seventeen participants including six preoperative and postoperative nurses, seven intraoperative nurses, and four CRNAs in the United States were interviewed. The interviews were conducted between 26 April–24 June 2018. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and the COREQ checklist was used to report data collection, analysis and the results. Results Three major themes and two categories within each theme were identified: (a) surgical innovation: nurse perception and workflow; (b) interprofessional practice: teamwork and standards; and (c) outcome: patient outcomes and system outcomes. Conclusions The findings indicate that RALS has the potential to improve patient outcomes when performed in a timely fashion by skilled surgeons, and efficient, well‐trained surgical teams. For patients to experience full benefits of RALS, patient characteristics, the underlying reason for surgery, and cost must be considered. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study highlight the necessity of promoting factors that improve the surgical team training and practice for RALS and will ultimately impact patient outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic‐assisted surgery

Schuessler

Stiles

Mancuso

2019

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019;8(2):210-217 www.annalscts.com is the key to standardize the robotic technique, reducing the time and the cost of the procedures and increasing their efficacy and safety (11,12).…”

Section: Evolution Of the Robotic Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

The evolution of robotic thoracic surgery

Zirafa

Romano

Key

et al. 2019

Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Robotic surgery has the features to represent the future of surgery, considering the rapid evolution of its technology and the resulting in the surgical field. In the last years, the robotic technique in thoracic surgery has progressively become widespread in the word, particularly for the treatment of the mediastinal and pulmonary lesions. The development of technology in the robotic system has been associated with the improvement of intraoperative and postoperative results. Due to the satisfying results and increasing experience and confidence with the robotic technique, surgeons are consequently enlarging the surgical indication, moving to increasingly challenging cases. Thoracic robotic surgery is being affirmed as a safe technique also for those complex cases, which in the past were considered a matter solely for open surgery. In fact, robotic surgery is increasingly associated with positive surgical results and guarantees less traumatism and a fast recovery to the patients. These positive results have resulted from the evolution of the technique, which has developed in parallel with the evolution of the technology, exploiting to its best the latest features of the robotic system. These features, such as the fluorescence-detection tool or the robotic stapler, have been aiding the surgeon to maximise the safety and feasibility of the application of the robotic technique to thoracic surgery.

show abstract

“…Ainda assim, a equipe de cirurgiões precisa estar apta, caso haja necessidade de conversão do procedimento para uma cirurgia aberta (Carlos & Saulan, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…As vantagens desse tipo de abordagem no período perioperatório, quando comparado à cirurgia aberta, incluem: redução do tempo de internação; redução da ocorrência de complicações; menor perda sanguínea; diminuição da dor pósoperatória; melhores resultados estéticos; e redução do tempo de afastamento das atividades diárias (Carlos & Saulan, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Perfil de saúde hospitalar dos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia robótica: estudo retrospectivo observacional

Meneses

Matos

Eleutério

et al. 2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A cirurgia robótica é uma tecnologia minimamente invasiva com a necessidade de treinamento específico e conhecimento da clientela para a operacionalização desse recurso. Faz-se necessário conhecimento profundo dessa realidade e dos fatores determinantes de aspectos clínicos e procedimentais nos hospitais de formação. O estudo trouxe como objetivo identificar o perfil cirúrgico dos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia robótica em um hospital universitário. Como metodologia, trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo, com abordagem quantitativa descritiva. A coleta de dados foi a partir dos registros dos prontuários dos usuários assistidos pela equipe de cirurgia robótica, de julho a dezembro de 2019. Os resultados mostraram que foram realizados 139 procedimentos, sendo a cirurgia urológica a principal especialidade robótica (61,2%), em homens (64,7%) entre 60 e 69 anos (43,2%), ASA 2 (77,7%) e a hipertensão o fator de risco mais frequente (46,8%). A cirurgia robótica utiliza a anestesia geral (91,3%) com um tempo médio de 2 a 4 horas de cirurgia (43,2%) e 4 a 6 horas sob efeito anestésico (57,5%). A posição de Trendelemburg associada à litotomia ocorreu na maioria das cirurgias (45,3%) com escala ELPO com escore maior ou igual a 20 (52,5%). A capnografia é fundamental (95,7%), além do acesso venoso periférico (97,9%), sendo a complicação perioperatória a via aérea difícil (2,9%), ainda que os escores baixos estejam de acordo com os dados internacionais. Conclusão: os dados obtidos neste estudo permitiram identificar o perfil dessa clientela, oferecendo embasamento à equipe de saúde para atuar de acordo com a especificidade cirúrgica.

show abstract

Robotic Emergencies: Are You Prepared for a Disaster?

Cited by 10 publications

References 9 publications

Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic‐assisted surgery

Perceptions and experiences of perioperative nurses and nurse anaesthetists in robotic‐assisted surgery

The evolution of robotic thoracic surgery

Perfil de saúde hospitalar dos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia robótica: estudo retrospectivo observacional

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About