2000
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2000.10595935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Efficient Estimation of the Tail Index of a Single-Parameter Pareto Distribution

Abstract: Estimation of the tail index parameter of a single-parameter Pareto model has wide application in actuarial and other sciences. Here we examine various estimators from the standpoint of two competing criteria: efficiency and robustness against upper outliers. With the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) being efficient but nonrobust, we desire alternative estimators that retain a relatively high degree of efficiency while also being adequately robust. A new generalized median type estimator is introduced and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Brazauskas and Serfl ing, 2000 showing that small errors in the estimation of the tail index can already produce large errors in the estimation of quantiles based on the tail index. Hence robust operators and procedures have to be implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This is in agreement with Brazauskas and Serfl ing, 2000 showing that small errors in the estimation of the tail index can already produce large errors in the estimation of quantiles based on the tail index. Hence robust operators and procedures have to be implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, the robust estimatorη (2,2) remains quite stable with value unchanged (although for some data sets its value would change somewhat, but not dramatically). We would expect similar results with the more efficient competitorη (5,5) , whose computation, however, requires for each of µ and σ taking the median of = 4950 as forη (2,2) . This computation may be carried out via an efficient algorithm or by the modified method described in Appendix A.5.…”
Section: Summary Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A good overall estimator appears to beη (5,5) , which offers quite high ARE above 0.91 uniformly over σ, combined with favorable BP of 0.13 and acceptable standardized GES * within the range 2.4 to 2.8. The estimatorη (9,9) , however, which offers ARE above 0.96 uniformly over σ, is more attractive if lower BP of 0.07 and higher GES * in the range 2.9 to 3.8 can be tolerated.…”
Section: Summary Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the presence of data contamination or when the sample deviates from the Pareto model, the MLE is not robust and becomes severely biased (Victoria-Feser and Ronchetti 1994;Finkelstein et al 2006). To make matters worse, even small errors in estimation of the Pareto exponent can produce large errors in estimation of quantities based on estimates of the exponent such as extreme quantiles, upper-tail probabilities and mean excess functions (Brazauskas and Serfling 2000). Similarly, inequality measures computed for the data simulated from the Pareto model are largely affected by even small or moderate data contamination (Cowell and Victoria-Feser 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%