2012
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201200264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and high‐resolution simulations of nonlinear electrokinetic processes in variable cross‐section channels

Abstract: We present a model and an associated numerical scheme to simulate complex electrokinetic processes in channels with nonuniform cross-sectional area. We develop a quasi-1D model based on local cross-sectional area averaging of the equations describing unsteady, multispecies, electromigration-diffusion transport. Our approach uses techniques of lubrication theory to approximate electrokinetic flows in channels with arbitrary variations in cross-section; and we include chemical equilibrium calculations for weak e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LE is composed of 100 mM sodium hydroxide and 200 mM Hepes. Based on one-dimensional numerical simulations using the Stanford public release electrophoretic separation solver (SPRESSO) [23,24] along with ionic strength corrections [25], the TE zone behind the shock wave is composed of 72.48 mM Bistris and 172.5 mM Hepes. For this ITP system, numerical simulations predict that μ L = 42.6 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 , μ T = 7.77 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 , σ L = 0.5617 S m −1 , and σ T = 0.1024 S m −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LE is composed of 100 mM sodium hydroxide and 200 mM Hepes. Based on one-dimensional numerical simulations using the Stanford public release electrophoretic separation solver (SPRESSO) [23,24] along with ionic strength corrections [25], the TE zone behind the shock wave is composed of 72.48 mM Bistris and 172.5 mM Hepes. For this ITP system, numerical simulations predict that μ L = 42.6 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 , μ T = 7.77 × 10 −9 m 2 V −1 s −1 , σ L = 0.5617 S m −1 , and σ T = 0.1024 S m −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that for Pe = 10, both diffusive and convective effects are relevant and hence it marks the transition between diffusion‐ and convection‐dominated regimes. Besides these 2D simulations, in the Supporting Information, we also provide 1D simulations of FASS using SPRESSO (Stanford Public Release Electophoretic Separation Solver) simulation tool for the case when EOF is absent. These 1D simulations also confirm the scaling behavior predicted by Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(39), respectively, against numerical solution obtained from SPRESSO 35 using the SLIP mode scheme. 36 We use a common ITP buffer chemistry, with HCl as the leading ion, Hepes as the trailing ion, and Tris as the common counter ion. Using the same background chemistry, we compare the analyte distribution obtained for three analyte mobilities of 24, 45, and 33 (in units 10 −9 [m 2 V −1 sec −1 ]).…”
Section: Exact and Approximate Solutions For Analyte Concentratiomentioning
confidence: 99%