2018
DOI: 10.1080/20550340.2018.1439688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust evaluation of flow front data for in-plane permeability characterization by radial flow experiments

Abstract: b department of Polymer Materials and Plastics engineering, clausthal university of technology, clausthal-Zellerfeld, germany; c institut für verbundwerkstoffe gmbH, Kaiserslautern, germany ABSTRACT A novel approach is presented for modeling the temporally advancing fluid flow front in radial flow experiments for in-plane permeability characterization of reinforcing fabrics. The method is based on fitting an elliptic paraboloid to the flow front data collected throughout such an experiment. This "paraboloid" a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the magnitude of variations induced by analysis it was decided to recalculate some of the results using a unified analysis approach. For this, the data sets (fluid injection pressure, dynamic fluid viscosity, flow front data) originally used in step (2) and (3) were collected and evaluated according to an uniform procedure: For step (2), the elliptic paraboloid fitting method introduced by Fauster et al [9] was applied to all of the collected data sets, and for step (3), the Adams/Rebenfeld algorithm was used. As the paraboloid method allows fitting an elliptic paraboloid to the entire set of flow front data acquired during the radial flow experiments in a single step, it is a global method.…”
Section: Influence Of Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the magnitude of variations induced by analysis it was decided to recalculate some of the results using a unified analysis approach. For this, the data sets (fluid injection pressure, dynamic fluid viscosity, flow front data) originally used in step (2) and (3) were collected and evaluated according to an uniform procedure: For step (2), the elliptic paraboloid fitting method introduced by Fauster et al [9] was applied to all of the collected data sets, and for step (3), the Adams/Rebenfeld algorithm was used. As the paraboloid method allows fitting an elliptic paraboloid to the entire set of flow front data acquired during the radial flow experiments in a single step, it is a global method.…”
Section: Influence Of Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4): (i) The images were rotated to align them with the images created by the simulation, (ii) empty zones outside the fabric were removed, (iii) image areas showing the stiffing frame of the mechanical setup were removed and (iv) parts of the flow front, occluded by the stiffening frame, were supplemented by a specifically developed, automated mechanism. The latter involves fitting an elliptical geometry model to selected data points along the fluid flow front [16] and extrapolating parabolic models for the major and minor ellipse axis length [17], respectively.…”
Section: Image and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common products manufactured with this technology are tubes and reinforcements rods, that have a core made of linear filaments and a braided cover. [ 13,128–134 ]…”
Section: Continuous Processing Of In Situ Impregnated Fiber Rovings: Current Process Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common model to describe fluid flow through a porous material is Darcy's law; it correlates the volume‐averaged flow rate ν with permeability K , pressure gradient ∇P , and viscosity η – see Equation (). [ 10,131,205–207 ] Viscosity can be defined as the fluid's resistance to flow. [ 208 ] A permeability equation based on the research of Kozeny and Carman [ 184,209–211 ] (Equation ()) allows to estimate the permeability in longitudinal direction via the fiber volume ratio ( e F ), the fiber radius ( r F ), and the Kozeny constant k , a geometric factor. υ=KPη, K=rF21eF34keF2. …”
Section: Main Effects On the Roving During Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%