2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.26.437196
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust, Fiducial-Free Drift Correction for Super-resolution Imaging

Abstract: We describe a robust, fiducial-free method of drift correction for use in single molecule localization-based super-resolution methods. The method combines periodic 3D registration of the sample using brightfield images with a fast post-processing algorithm that corrects residual registration errors and drift between registration events. The method is robust to low numbers of collected localizations, requires no specialized hardware, and provides stability and drift correction for an indefinite time period.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frame-connection problem deals with combining these repeated localizations into a single localization with higher precision. To the best of our knowledge, only two solutions to the frame-connection problem are in use: 1) combining any localizations within N frames and d pixels of one another, as is done in the popular ThunderSTORM package ( Ovesný et al, 2014 ) (we’ll refer to this method as the “classical” approach); or 2) by a hypothesis test assuming Gaussian localization noise (“hypothesis test”) ( Wester et al, 2021 ). A modification to the classical approach involves setting the separation threshold d to be some multiple of the localization error, as is done in the PYMEVisualize package ( Marin et al, 2021 ) (referred to as “chaining” in that work and as “revised classical” here).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frame-connection problem deals with combining these repeated localizations into a single localization with higher precision. To the best of our knowledge, only two solutions to the frame-connection problem are in use: 1) combining any localizations within N frames and d pixels of one another, as is done in the popular ThunderSTORM package ( Ovesný et al, 2014 ) (we’ll refer to this method as the “classical” approach); or 2) by a hypothesis test assuming Gaussian localization noise (“hypothesis test”) ( Wester et al, 2021 ). A modification to the classical approach involves setting the separation threshold d to be some multiple of the localization error, as is done in the PYMEVisualize package ( Marin et al, 2021 ) (referred to as “chaining” in that work and as “revised classical” here).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the examples shown, we find that it is most important to characterize resolution lost on time-scales shorter than the time-scale of drift-correction. Fortunately, numerous methods exist to correct for rigid drift on time-scales relevant to the temporal correlations of many SMLM probes (34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41), suggesting that the method presented in this report is broadly applicable for a range of experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%