2007
DOI: 10.1080/03610910701539708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Fits for Copula Models

Abstract: In this paper we obtain robust estimators for copula parameters through the minimization of weighted goodness of¯t statistics. Di®erent weight functions emphasize di®erent regions on the unit square and are able to handle di®erent locations of model violation. The resulting W MDE estimators are compared to the classical maximum likelihood estimators MLE, and to their weighted version W MLE, an estimator obtained in two steps. The weights obtained in the¯rst step by the application of a high breakdown point sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several estimation methods proposed for copula parameters [22,[35][36][37]. Among them, maximum likelihood (ML), inference functions for margins (IFM), and canonical maximum likelihood (CML) techniques are used more frequently than others [22].…”
Section: Fit a Copula Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several estimation methods proposed for copula parameters [22,[35][36][37]. Among them, maximum likelihood (ML), inference functions for margins (IFM), and canonical maximum likelihood (CML) techniques are used more frequently than others [22].…”
Section: Fit a Copula Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a pseudo maxi- 4 Other distributions have been tested but we only provide some results obtained using the Generalized Pareto Distribution in the fifth section mum likelihood method to estimate the copulas parameters (Mendes et al (2007), Weiss (2010) providing the value of the corresponding AIC (Akaike (1974)) in order to discriminate between different classes of copulas. We select our model following a triple statement:…”
Section: Experimental Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best knowledge of the author, the only study that is concerned with the robustness of copula models is Mendes et al (2007) (recent papers by Kim et al (2007) and Fantazzini (2009a) focus on the 1 robustness of copula models to misspecified marginals; however, they do not consider contaminated data). In their work, Mendes et al (2007) derive robust estimators for the parameters of copulas and analyse their finite sample properties by means of a simulation study. The two strategies they employ to robustify the estimation of copula parameters include (1) the inclusion of weight functions in Minimum-Distance estimators and (2) the identification and exclusion of outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Mendes et al (2007) only use the DonohoStahel projection based estimator of multivariate location and scatter in their simulation study, we compare the Minimum Covariance Determinant estimator of Rousseeuw (1985), the Donoho-Stahel estimator, Rocke's constrained M-estimator, the S-estimator based on Tukey's biweight function and the orthogonalized Gnanadesikan-Kettenring estimator with each other regarding their ability to robustify the results of the copula GoF-tests. Fourth, this paper is the first to analyse the effects of mistakingly assuming a single parametric copula when the data actually stems from a mixture copula.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation