TENCON 2010 - 2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2010.5685901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust hybrid anti-islanding method for inverter-based distributed generation

Abstract: This paper proposes a robust hybrid anti-islanding method for Inverter-based Distributed Generation (DG). This method is based on Active and passive detection techniques. Active anti islanding technique generates disturbances at the output of the distributed generation by Positive feedback and Continuous feedback signal injection which is based on DQ implementation. On the other hand passive anti islanding technique detects islanding by measuring voltage, frequency, active and reactive power and total harmonic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, active islanding detection methods are based on the occurrence of disturbance on the terminal of DG, which will have a significant change when DG gets disconnected from the power grid [13]; therefore, active methods stay effective, even if there is a small power mismatch between load demand and DG capacity. The dominant active techniques are: Slip-Mode frequency Shift method (SMS) [14], Active Frequency Drift method (AFD) [4], Sandia Frequency Shift method (SFS) [15], and Sandia Voltage Shift method (SVS) [15]. The drawbacks of active methods are the reduction of power quality, and the lower speed of detection in comparison with passive methods [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, active islanding detection methods are based on the occurrence of disturbance on the terminal of DG, which will have a significant change when DG gets disconnected from the power grid [13]; therefore, active methods stay effective, even if there is a small power mismatch between load demand and DG capacity. The dominant active techniques are: Slip-Mode frequency Shift method (SMS) [14], Active Frequency Drift method (AFD) [4], Sandia Frequency Shift method (SFS) [15], and Sandia Voltage Shift method (SVS) [15]. The drawbacks of active methods are the reduction of power quality, and the lower speed of detection in comparison with passive methods [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen, active and passive methods have their own advantages and drawbacks. Combining these two methods in order to get benefit from all the advantages, results in a new category of islanding protection techniques called hybrid anti-islanding methods [15]. Some of the recent literature focused on hybrid islanding detection techniques are: A robust hybrid islanding detection method based on the combination of current injection method as the active method, and a frequency relay, a voltage relay and the THD method as the passive method, is proposed in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main drawback of this methods is the so called Non-Detection Zone (NDZ). In other words, passive methods are unable to detect islanding if the mismatch between the DG generated power and loads consumption in the island is small [4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Active methods have a lower speed of detection in compare with passive methods [12]. Some commonly used active techniques are Active frequency drift (AFD), Sandia frequency shift (SFS) [13], Sandia voltage shift (SVS) [14], Slip mode frequency shift (SMS) [15] and voltage phase angle difference [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%