2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2012.0325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust l 2 l filtering for discrete‐time Markovian jump linear systems with multiple sensor faults, uncertain transition probabilities and time‐varying delays

Abstract: In this study, the authors present the research results on the robust investigate the robust l 2-l ∞ filtering for Markovian jump linear systems with multiple sensor faults, uncertain probability transition matrix and time-varying delays. The multiple sensor faults are modelled as multiple independent Bernoulli processes with constant probabilities. The uncertain probability transition matrix is modelled via the polytopic uncertainties for each row in the transition matrix. By using the augmentation method, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is not, however, guaranteed and the performance of Kalman filtering would be degraded inevitably since most practical systems have model uncertainties. Hence, to reduce the effect of non-satisfaction condition in the accuracy of estimation, robust Kalman filtering schemes are introduced, for instance, see [31][32][33][34]. In general, uncertainties in systems can be categorised into two different classes including uncertainty in parameters of the model, and uncertainty in the observation process.…”
Section: Kalman Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is not, however, guaranteed and the performance of Kalman filtering would be degraded inevitably since most practical systems have model uncertainties. Hence, to reduce the effect of non-satisfaction condition in the accuracy of estimation, robust Kalman filtering schemes are introduced, for instance, see [31][32][33][34]. In general, uncertainties in systems can be categorised into two different classes including uncertainty in parameters of the model, and uncertainty in the observation process.…”
Section: Kalman Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compute the state estimateX a k|k by (12), and obtain its covariance W a k|k by (13) Step 6: Output. Computex k|k by accumulating all state estimates in each mode fromĵ k|k by (8), and obtain the covariance P k|k by (9) Step 7: Set k−1 ← k and go to Step 3 Fig. 2 Recursive structure of the LMMSE estimator in [9] 4 Numerical example A numerical example for the discrete-time MJLSRDM is presented in this section based on two Markovian states to compare the LMMSE estimator in [9], the interacting multiple model (IMM) method where the estimator in [21] or [23] for the one-step or two-step randomly delayed measurements case under the linear system is adopted in each mode, and the proposed LMRDE estimator.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable research has been undertaken in the field of estimation theory in relation to the discrete-time Markovian jump systems, such as non-linear filtering [1][2][3][4][5], target tracking [6,7] and fault-tolerant robust filtering [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtering problem has wide applications in signal‐processing, communications and control application [8]. In recent years, estimating a state or a parameter through filter design has attracted considerable research interest see [9–14]. For example, a distributed scriptH fusion filtering problem for a class of networked multi‐sensor fusion systems with communication bandwidth constraints has been investigated in [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%