1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001900050183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Kalman filter for rank deficient observation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the paper by Koch and Yang (1998) downweighting is applied on the parameters. However, in this study, to be consistent with the previously developed SVD methodology (Rohm and Bosy, 2011;Rohm, 2012Rohm, , 2013) the downweighting of the parameters is not used.…”
Section: Kalman Filter Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the paper by Koch and Yang (1998) downweighting is applied on the parameters. However, in this study, to be consistent with the previously developed SVD methodology (Rohm and Bosy, 2011;Rohm, 2012Rohm, , 2013) the downweighting of the parameters is not used.…”
Section: Kalman Filter Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the Kalman filter sequence as shown in Koch and Yang (1998) for filtering observations will be transformed to the following sequence:…”
Section: Kalman Filter Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, since the Kalman filter is not completely resilient to outliers (due to its iterative strategy based on the Maximum A Posteriori), even in its robust version ( [19]), we apply RANSAC directly on the measurements to avoid outliers. Indeed, the multi-modality of the conditional density is only due to the output statistics: assuming that the posterior density of the hidden variables (the state of the system related to the registration) is unimodal, the EKF with RANSAC attempts to estimate the principal mode of the dynamic evolution.…”
Section: Morp-a064mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose 0%, 5%, ..., 85% outliers and for each of the filters we run 100 experiments and store the estimated motion. Then, we compute the mean and the standard deviation for each outlier level and for both the robust EKF (an extension of [13] to nonlinear systems) and KALMANSAC and plot the results in Figure 3. As one can see, the robust EKF consistently fails to produce any sensible estimate of motion as soon as some outliers are introduced in the measurements (Figure 3 left).…”
Section: Structure From Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%