2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2952098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Nucleus Detection With Partially Labeled Exemplars

Abstract: Quantitative analysis of cell nuclei in microscopic images is an essential yet challenging source of biological and pathological information. The major challenge is accurate detection and segmentation of densely packed nuclei in images acquired under a variety of conditions. Mask R-CNN-based methods have achieved state-of-the-art nucleus segmentation. However, the current pipeline requires fully annotated training images, which are time consuming to create and sometimes noisy. Importantly, nuclei often appear … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nucleus detection pipeline, as previously described (Feng et al, 2019), was trained on 30 images containing DAPI-stained cell nuclei ($180 per image) that were manually labeled by human experts. To detect mRNA puncta, we used a splitting strategy with a marker-controlled watershed approach and a variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture model (Feng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Serial Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nucleus detection pipeline, as previously described (Feng et al, 2019), was trained on 30 images containing DAPI-stained cell nuclei ($180 per image) that were manually labeled by human experts. To detect mRNA puncta, we used a splitting strategy with a marker-controlled watershed approach and a variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture model (Feng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Serial Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured values of ZSI = 0.933 ± 0.14, Precision = 0.946 ± 0.06 and Recall = 0.984 ± 0.00 Limitations: Since the method is based on a U-shaped network, a skip connection arises. The model would not have performed better due to the skip connection Year: 2019 Feng et al ( 2019 ) propose a region-proposal module to perform exemplar learning Features: Backbone: ResNeXt-101–64 × 4d Loss: Classification Loss was Cross-entropy loss and Regression Loss is Smooth L1 The proposed model used a self-attention mechanism to capture the similarity between nuclei and to strongly handle moderately labelled training images, The framework wherein Region Proposal Network (RPN) to produce a large number of bounding box candidates to densely cover the image. Furthermore, an object score for an individual candidate is calculated Comparison: DIST and CNN Model with Three Convolutional Layers (CNN-3) Datasets: Cell images of seven distinct organs (breast, kidney, Liver, Prostate, Bladder, Colon, and Stomach) were extracted from Nucleus Dataset (Cicconet et al 2017 ), Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained Histopathology Dataset (Naylor et al 2018 ) Parameters: Aggregated Jaccard Index (AJI) Inference: The proposed model was better in terms of performance as compared to other models as it delivered a better solution when extreme segmentation accuracy was desirable by using it as a computer-assisted annotation tool to produce high-quality fully annotated training datasets.…”
Section: Survey On Deep Learning Based Nucleus Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used probes for Aqp4 (catalog no. A nucleus detection pipeline, as previously described (Feng et al, 2019), was trained on 30 images containing DAPI-stained cell nuclei (~180 per image) that were manually labeled by human experts. To detect mRNA puncta, we used a splitting strategy with a marker-controlled watershed approach and a variational Bayesian Gaussian mixture model (Feng et al, 2012).…”
Section: Serial Single-molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%