2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust obstacle avoidance for aerial platforms using adaptive model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method utilizes the LOS guidance to parameterize different paths using only one parameter in 2D and two parameters in 3D. This method has a limited set of possible control actions making it less complete than optimal control methods with full control over the drone's behaviour, such as in [3]. The major advantage of the method is that the run-time is linear with respect to the number of possible combinations of control-actions, and is easily parallelizable which makes it much faster than full optimal control solutions on multi-core processors.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method utilizes the LOS guidance to parameterize different paths using only one parameter in 2D and two parameters in 3D. This method has a limited set of possible control actions making it less complete than optimal control methods with full control over the drone's behaviour, such as in [3]. The major advantage of the method is that the run-time is linear with respect to the number of possible combinations of control-actions, and is easily parallelizable which makes it much faster than full optimal control solutions on multi-core processors.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done for the linear case with linear constraints in [1] and for a nonlinear case with a predefined set of manoeuvres in [2]. Another example of bounding is in [3] where the positional variance at each time-step is calculated and a constraint is introduced that requires that obstacles are k standard deviations away from the drone. Bounding the accepted uncertainty or accepted positional offsets makes sure that the probability of the drone colliding is smaller than the probability that the bounds were wrong.…”
Section: Introduction a Background And Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, this framework is well-established in the field and has demonstrated success in diverse range of problems including manipulation [8], visual servoing [8], and motion planning. In robotic motion planning, MPC is widely in use for motion planning of mobile robots, manipulators, humanoids and aerial robots such as quadrotors [9]. Despite its merits, it can be computationally very expensive, especially in context of robot planning and control, since (a) unlike in process industries, typical robotic systems demand re-planning online at high frequency, (b) most systems have a non-linear dynamical model and (c) constraints apply both on state and controls.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary obstacles, such as walls or the floor, are also considered analogously as soft planar constraints based on its position r o i and normal vector n i as shown in (11) and (12).…”
Section: A Trajectory Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although great effort has been done in this area, dealing with multiple three-dimensional obstacles remains difficult. Recent work using NMPC often simplifies this problem by considering only the closest obstacle [11] or reducing the obstacles as bi-dimensional static [12], [13] or dynamic [14] constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%