1994
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(94)90072-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust optimal decisions with stochastic nonlinear economic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policymakers can evaluate the robustness of future policies with this information (e.g. policies that ensure profitability in a range of future developments) (Becker et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers can evaluate the robustness of future policies with this information (e.g. policies that ensure profitability in a range of future developments) (Becker et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these back-off (penalty) terms are being updated at each iteration in the present algorithm. This is a key difference with respect to penalty-based methods, which penalize deviations from a desired behavior through the implementation of constant penalty terms or sum of errors (i.e., sum of squares) in the objective function. ,, The reformulation of the inequality constraints implies that, by shifting away from the nominal operation of the plant (i.e., when Θ̂ unc is considered), dynamic operability of the plant may be ensured, even under the effects of stochastic realizations in the uncertain parameters. Robustness of the solution can be fine-tuned by modifying the user-defined weight parameter λ p , which determines the amount of variability (i.e., back-off terms) that is considered on each constraint g p,t due to model uncertainty. s.t. …”
Section: Back-off Decomposition Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the more estimation errors in the forecast, the less willingness planners are likely to adopt a dynamic order admission policy in practice. In the researches of Becker, Hall, and Rustem (1994) and Balakrishnan et al (1999), they also concluded that if a model is not sensitive to estimation error, it can make the model more risk-averse and more attractive for the planners. Based on these statements, we intend to investigate the impact of different types of estimation error under various order structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%