2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2004.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
214
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
214
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared the supervised k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm and unsupervised SOM and found similar performance but k-NN was easier to use. Qui et al 24 applied a wavelet filter and SOM for performance assessment of bearing rolling element. The wavelet filter was used for signal denoising and enhancing of weak signatures and SOM for assessment of bearing degradation utilizing time domain features.…”
Section: Jammu and Danaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compared the supervised k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm and unsupervised SOM and found similar performance but k-NN was easier to use. Qui et al 24 applied a wavelet filter and SOM for performance assessment of bearing rolling element. The wavelet filter was used for signal denoising and enhancing of weak signatures and SOM for assessment of bearing degradation utilizing time domain features.…”
Section: Jammu and Danaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform this degradation, a process of normalization is conducted to transform values of features into a common scale and group them as input set for feature-fusion. SOM neural network is employed to combine the input set into a single out indicator which is minimum quantization error (MQE) (Qiu et al, 2003), as shown in Fig. 18.…”
Section: Machine Health Assessment and Failure Threshold Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHM generally combines condition monitoring, fault diagnostics, fault prognostics, and decision support [3]. Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction aims at assessing the performance degradation of equipment and detecting the impending failure [4]. Therefore, accurate RUL prediction is regarded as one of the most central components in performing PHM, since necessary maintenance actions are implemented based on the RUL prediction result [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%