“…They tested 72 samples comprising of controls and isolates from human, avian, equine, and swine species. The results provided the correct types and subtypes for an average of 72% of the isolates, the correct type and partially correct subtype information for 13% of the isolates, the correct type only for 10% of the isolates, false-negative signals for 4% of the isolates, and false-positive signals for 1% of the isolates [22,23].…”