2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92537-0_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Speaker Identification Algorithms and Results in Noisy Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is particularly expressed in very noisy environments similar to those in our study. Ayhan et al showed that by a combination of mask estimation, gammatone features with bounded marginalization dealing with unreliable features with a classic Gaussian mixture model may lead to an improvement in distinguishing the lead signal [31].…”
Section: Analysis Of Industrial Machinery Data For Predictive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is particularly expressed in very noisy environments similar to those in our study. Ayhan et al showed that by a combination of mask estimation, gammatone features with bounded marginalization dealing with unreliable features with a classic Gaussian mixture model may lead to an improvement in distinguishing the lead signal [31].…”
Section: Analysis Of Industrial Machinery Data For Predictive Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of their method of implementation and testing were increased up to 28% accuracy at signal to noise ratio (SNR) 5 dB. Ayhan and Kwan [21] developed a vigorous speaker identification scheme under noisy conditions which implicates "mask estimation, gammatone features with bounded marginalization to deal with unreliable features, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for speaker identification". Evaluation and assessments were performed to determine the speaker identification performance of the proposed algorithm, and results showed that it substantially outperforms the conventional method MFCC with Cepstral Mean Normalization (MFCC-CMN) at low signal-to-noise conditions.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars favored examining the use of CASA modules in noisy speech, in conjunction with one of the above-mentioned acoustic features, and results showed substantial improvement in identification performance in some cases. Moreover, many studies used the conventional classifiers, such as SVMs [13], GMMs [18], [21] and HMMs [23][24][25] , while many recent work explored the DNN-based classifiers [16], [26].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The SST feature has better identification ability for complex modulated signals in comparison to the former methods, whereas its effect fluctuates when used to process simple modulated signals. In addition, some recognition methods in like acoustic and speech identification, like Gaussian Mixed Model (GMM) may also be migrated to SEI signal recognition [8,9]. However, there still exist some problems: GMM is based on a principle that the datasets should be large enough, unfortunately, it is not easy to realize in SEI, because radar signal acquisition needs higher experimental conditions, such as radar, microwave anechoic chamber, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%