2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust visual domain adaptation with low-rank reconstruction

Abstract: Visual domain adaptation addresses the problem of adapting the sample distribution of the source domain to the target domain, where the recognition task is intended but the data distributions are different. In this paper, we present a low-rank reconstruction method to reduce the domain distribution disparity. Specifically, we transform the visual samples in the source domain into an intermediate representation such that each transformed source sample can be linearly reconstructed by the samples of the target d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrastive methods capture the semantic information of the samples by maximizing the lower bound of the mutual information between two augmented views (Kang et al, 2019b;Singh, 2021;Tang et al, 2021). In addition, reconstruction-based methods achieve alignment by carrying out source domain classification and reconstruction of target domain data or both source and target domain data (Ghifary et al, 2016;Jhuo et al, 2012). More discussion can be founded in existing review papers focusing on domain adaptation (Ramponi and Plank, 2020;Liu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrastive methods capture the semantic information of the samples by maximizing the lower bound of the mutual information between two augmented views (Kang et al, 2019b;Singh, 2021;Tang et al, 2021). In addition, reconstruction-based methods achieve alignment by carrying out source domain classification and reconstruction of target domain data or both source and target domain data (Ghifary et al, 2016;Jhuo et al, 2012). More discussion can be founded in existing review papers focusing on domain adaptation (Ramponi and Plank, 2020;Liu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saenko et al [3,18] have calculated a transformation matrix such that the distance between instances in the same domain is minimised while that from different domains is maximised. The work published in [17,[19][20][21] have projected the original data from source and target domains to an optimal subspace, where the disparity between the two domains is minimised. Application of DA for improved results of object categorisation and video classification have also been discussed in [3,17,19,[22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussion On Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the generalization bottleneck and bridge different distributions, extensive studies have been conducted on DA. 12,3438 Some existing approaches 39,40 attempted to align feature spaces by exploiting shift-invariant information to match the target domain with the source domain. Meanwhile, from the perspective of deep learning, some methods 18,22,41–44 adopted Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and association-based losses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the generalization bottleneck and bridge different distributions, extensive studies have been conducted on DA. 12,[34][35][36][37][38] Some existing approaches 39,40 attempted to align feature spaces by exploiting shift-invariant information to match the target domain with the source domain.…”
Section: Da Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%