2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0363(20000615)33:3<313::aid-fld7>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robustness versus accuracy in shock-wave computations

Abstract: Despite constant progress in the development of upwind schemes, some failings still remain. Quirk recently reported (Quirk JJ. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1994; 18: 555-574) that approximate Riemann solvers, which share the exact capture of contact discontinuities, generally suffer from such failings. One of these is the odd -even decoupling that occurs along planar shocks aligned with the mesh. First, a few results on some failings a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, this correction, even modified to account for directional independency and to reduce the dissipation addition on linear waves, is combined with a tunable pressure sensing function to become active only in the vicinity of shocks [16]. It must be pointed out that even using HartenÕs entropy fix on the eigenvalue associated to the shear wave, a finite amount of dissipation is needed to damp transverse perturbations since, for instance a typical value of HartenÕs parameter d ¼ 0:1 cannot damp perturbations in QuirkÕs problem while d ¼ 0:2 removes the odd-even decoupling problem [17]. Similarly, a transverse velocity component can damp transverse perturbations (see Section 4.3) provided that it has reached a sufficient value.…”
Section: Cures For the Carbunclesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Unfortunately, this correction, even modified to account for directional independency and to reduce the dissipation addition on linear waves, is combined with a tunable pressure sensing function to become active only in the vicinity of shocks [16]. It must be pointed out that even using HartenÕs entropy fix on the eigenvalue associated to the shear wave, a finite amount of dissipation is needed to damp transverse perturbations since, for instance a typical value of HartenÕs parameter d ¼ 0:1 cannot damp perturbations in QuirkÕs problem while d ¼ 0:2 removes the odd-even decoupling problem [17]. Similarly, a transverse velocity component can damp transverse perturbations (see Section 4.3) provided that it has reached a sufficient value.…”
Section: Cures For the Carbunclesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The triple point structure never looks physical and density perturbations are distributed behind the incident shock. Such artifacts are caused due to insufficient dissipations that can suppress the transverse perturbation [6,21].…”
Section: Mach 5 Shock Reflection Over a 46° Wedgesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The carbuncle phenomenon is known to be highly griddependent but does not require a large number of grid points [21]. The computational domain for this problem consists of a structured triangular grid with 14 × 318 cells in r-and θ-directions, respectively.…”
Section: Mach 15 Flow Over a Blunt-bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, schemes based on Riemann solvers are known to suffer from the carbuncle instability and oddeven decoupling (Quirk 1994). The schemes used here have been tested by an odd-even grid perturbation problem which was suggested by Quirk (1994) and used in many other papers (Robinet et al 2000;Gressier and Moschetta 2000;Liou 2000;Pandolfi and D'Ambrosio 2001). It is assumed that a shock wave propagates down a straight duct with a Mach number 6 and γ = 1.4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%