2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00215.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock and a Hard Place: Public Willingness to Trade Civil Rights and Liberties for Greater Security

Abstract: Our research examines the implications of political beliefs for the relationship between preferences for freedom and security. We briefly situate the relationship in historical context and relate it to today's struggle with terrorism. Then we examine the influence of political beliefs on normative preferences for how liberty and security should be related and for perceptions of how they currently are being balanced. Using original data from a national Internet survey of more than 3,000 respondents, we examine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see how some have applied CT to public health issues, see Kahan et al (2010) and Jenkins- Smith, Silva, and Song (2011). Lastly, for an example of the application of CT to national security issues, see Jenkins- Smith andHerron (2009) andHerron (2011). individualism, egalitarianism, political ideology, and political knowledge. We then expand upon their work by looking at the way in which political sophistication interacts with the full set of four cultural worldviews that are specified by CT.…”
Section: Cultural Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To see how some have applied CT to public health issues, see Kahan et al (2010) and Jenkins- Smith, Silva, and Song (2011). Lastly, for an example of the application of CT to national security issues, see Jenkins- Smith andHerron (2009) andHerron (2011). individualism, egalitarianism, political ideology, and political knowledge. We then expand upon their work by looking at the way in which political sophistication interacts with the full set of four cultural worldviews that are specified by CT.…”
Section: Cultural Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see how some have applied CT to public health issues, see Kahan et al () and Jenkins‐Smith, Silva, and Song (2011). Lastly, for an example of the application of CT to national security issues, see Jenkins‐Smith and Herron () and Ripberger, Jenkins‐Smith, and Herron ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCT says that cultural values are cognitively prior to facts in public risk conflicts: as a result of a complex of interrelated psychological mechanisms, groups of individuals will credit and dismiss evidence of risk in patterns that re-flect and reinforce their distinctive understandings of how society should be organized (Kahan, Braman, Cohen, Gastil & Slovic 2010;Jenkins-Smith & Herron 2009;DiMaggio 1997). Thus, persons with individualistic values can be expected to be relatively dismissive of environmental and technological risks, which if widely accepted would justify restricting commerce and industry, activities that people with such values hold in high regard.…”
Section: Three Models Of Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As individuals, citizens are thus likely to do better in their daily lives when they adopt toward putative hazards the stances that express their commitment to values that they share with others, irrespective of the fit between those beliefs and the actuarial magnitudes and probabilities of those risks. Empirical evidence suggests that ordinary citizens are reliably guided toward such stances by unconscious processing of cues, such as the emotional resonances of arguments and the apparent values of risk communicators (Kahan, JenkinsSmith & Braman 2011;Jenkins-Smith & Herron 2009;Jenkins-Smith 2001). But, contrary to the picture painted by the irrational-weigher model, ordinary citizens who are equipped and disposed to appraise scientific evidence of risk in a reflective, analytic manner do not necessarily converge in their beliefs; in-stead they will often become even more culturally polarized because of the special capacity they have to search out and interpret evidence in patterns that sustain the convergence between their risk perceptions and their group identities (Mercier & Sperber 2011;Kahan, Peters, Wittlin, Slovic, Ouellette, Braman & Mandel 2012).…”
Section: Three Models Of Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural worldview orientations have been shown to influence preference formation in ways consistent with the theory across a wide array of policy issues. These issues include immigration (Jackson, ), gun control (Kahan and Braman, ), national security (Jenkins‐Smith and Herron, ; Ripberger, Jenkins‐Smith, and Herron, ), nuclear waste (Jenkins‐Smith, ), and vaccinations (Song, ; Song, Silva, and Jenkins‐Smith, ). Despite the application of cultural theory in multiple studies across several policy areas, little research has examined the direct influence of cultural worldviews and the mediated influence of cultural worldviews acting through party attachment…”
Section: Cultural Theory and Partisanshipmentioning
confidence: 99%