“…The epistemic value of analogy was established long ago (see Wylie 1985, Lane 2006 and analogical reasoning has helped to make rock art meaningful in its broader social context on many occasions. Ethnography has been a real peer to archaeology, especially in case studies where ethnographic data have been complemented with a strong interest in landscape, the location of the rock art and the patterns of association of rock art and other elements (Deacon 1988, Morwood & Hobbs 1992, Smith 1992, Taçon & Faulstich 1993, Bradley et al 1994, Waddington 1996, Millerstrom 1997, Rosenfeld 1997, David & Lourandos 1998, Martínez 1998, Santos 1999, Layton 2000, Lee & Stasack 2005, Cruz Berrocal & Vicent 2007). For these reasons, an anti-ethnography declaration is totally out of place.…”