[Proceedings] IGARSS'91 Remote Sensing: Global Monitoring for Earth Management
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1991.579278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock fraction effects on the interpretation of microwave emission from soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rock fragment content has been shown to affect radar backscatter through its effect on water holding capacity [ Jackson et al , 1992] because rocks do not absorb appreciable amounts of water. This coupled with the fact that portable probes could only be inserted where rocks were absent caused an overestimation of bulk volumetric soil moisture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock fragment content has been shown to affect radar backscatter through its effect on water holding capacity [ Jackson et al , 1992] because rocks do not absorb appreciable amounts of water. This coupled with the fact that portable probes could only be inserted where rocks were absent caused an overestimation of bulk volumetric soil moisture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from early field and aircraft experiments demonstrated strong regression‐based relationships between surface moisture and both brightness temperature and surface emissivity [ Schmugge , 1976, 1977; Jackson et al , 1984]. Models have subsequently become more complex by accounting for canopy effects [ Mo et al , 1982; Jackson et al , 1982; Jackson and Schmugge , 1991], roughness [ Choudhury et al , 1979], polarization mixing [ Wang and Choudhury , 1981], and other perturbing factors [ Jackson and O'Neill , 1987; Jackson et al , 1992, 1997; O'Neill and Jackson , 1990]. While many of these models are based on radiative transfer theory, an element of empiricism often remains because of difficulty in parameterizing some components from other measurable biophysical properties and at more meaningful spatial scales.…”
Section: General Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency (active) microwave retrievals are difficult to obtain in regions with hi& rock contenl: due to increased backscatter and a weaker relationship with soil moisture (Jackson 1992) even when aggregated to 280 meter resolution, and thus remains an issue. Clearly, if there were more images available, particularly during and immediately following rainfall events, PEST-Noah would be able to perform better as for the M90 case.…”
Section: Calibration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%