Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 139 Scientific Results 1994
DOI: 10.2973/odp.proc.sr.139.243.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock Magnetic Properties of Hydrothermally Formed Iron Sulfides from Middle Valley, Juan de Fuca Ridge

Abstract: Hydrothermally formed sulfide samples recovered from the Juan de Fuca Ridge during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 139 were investigated to determine the carrier of remanent magnetization and to study rock magnetic properties. The samples were examined by isothermal remanent magnetization acquisition, alternating field demagnetization, back field measurements, thermomagnetic and hysteresis measurements, X-ray diffraction, and ore microscopy. Grain sizes for magnetite and pyrrhotite particles were estimated from hys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A magnetization of 5 A/m implies an average volume susceptibility of 0.11 SI units assuming an entirely induced magnetization in the ambient field of 54,500 nT. This value compares well with the average susceptibility measured on sulfide samples from ODP drill cores (arithmetic mean = 0.17 ± 0.15 SI; geometric mean = 0.08 SI [ Körner , 1994]). All samples from the sulfide mound contain predominantly pyrite (90%), with 2–10% magnetite and smaller amounts of hematite, pyrrhotite and other sulfides [ Körner , 1994].…”
Section: Results Near Bent Hillsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A magnetization of 5 A/m implies an average volume susceptibility of 0.11 SI units assuming an entirely induced magnetization in the ambient field of 54,500 nT. This value compares well with the average susceptibility measured on sulfide samples from ODP drill cores (arithmetic mean = 0.17 ± 0.15 SI; geometric mean = 0.08 SI [ Körner , 1994]). All samples from the sulfide mound contain predominantly pyrite (90%), with 2–10% magnetite and smaller amounts of hematite, pyrrhotite and other sulfides [ Körner , 1994].…”
Section: Results Near Bent Hillsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We observe that these observations of two strong positive anomalies correlate with the presence of previously collected sulfide material at the same location (Pedersen, Rapp , et al, ) and suggest that these sulfide deposits are creating a magnetic signal. This type of magnetic signature was observed in several locations around the world and is explained by the contrast between nonmagnetic sediments and the massive sulfide deposit usually containing highly magnetized magnetite, pyrrhotite (Gee et al, ; Körner, ; Pedersen, Rapp , et al, ; Tivey , ). The interpretation for the smaller anomaly is confirmed by video material and sampling of hydrothermal material composed of pyrite and heterogeneous fine‐grained chimney material (Pedersen, Rapp , et al, ) and corresponds to the Mohn's Treasure extinct hydrothermal field (MT‐1 in Figure ), as no water column indications of venting are registered at the site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At 0.2 T, only a 80%−90% saturation is achieved (cf. Körner, 1994). Comparable to the intensity after the 15-mT demagnetization step, the intensities of IRM @1T are highest in Subunit VIA, and Units VII and VIII.…”
Section: Isothermal Remanent Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 88%