2006
DOI: 10.1190/1.2202666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock physics characterization of hydrate-bearing deepwater sediments

Abstract: Suggested reading. "Direct measurement of in-situ methane quantities in a large gas-hydrate reservoir" by Dickens et al. (Nature, 1997). "Methane hydrate and free gas on the Blake Ridge from vertical seismic profiling" by Holbrook et al. (Science, 1996). "Rock-physics of a gas hydrate reservoir" by Dvorkin et al. (TLE, 2003). "Compressional and shear wave velocities in uncemented sediment containing gas hydrate" by Yun et al. (Geophysical Research Letters, 2005). The Rock Physics Handbook by Mavko et al. (Camb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction of effective bulk moduli following the Hertz-Mindlin (HM;Hertz 1882;Mindlin 1949) or Walton (1987) models has been found to be in good agreement with both laboratory data (Dutta, Mavko and Mukerji 2010;Saul, Lumley and Shragge 2013) and numerical simulations (Makse et al 1999;Sain 2010). Even though a few studies show that Walton's smooth model (total slippage) fits better with the laboratory data on dry sands (Zadeh, Mondol and Jahren 2016) and gas-hydrate bearing sediments (Sava and Hardage 2006), the majority of the published literature on this topic, including the data from Winkler (1983) and Goddard (1990), reports that effective shear modulus is largely over-predicted by the HM and Walton no-slip model. Unconsolidated sand, having no adhesive bonding by cements, is much more likely to have a situation in between the two extreme cases as modelled by Walton (1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Prediction of effective bulk moduli following the Hertz-Mindlin (HM;Hertz 1882;Mindlin 1949) or Walton (1987) models has been found to be in good agreement with both laboratory data (Dutta, Mavko and Mukerji 2010;Saul, Lumley and Shragge 2013) and numerical simulations (Makse et al 1999;Sain 2010). Even though a few studies show that Walton's smooth model (total slippage) fits better with the laboratory data on dry sands (Zadeh, Mondol and Jahren 2016) and gas-hydrate bearing sediments (Sava and Hardage 2006), the majority of the published literature on this topic, including the data from Winkler (1983) and Goddard (1990), reports that effective shear modulus is largely over-predicted by the HM and Walton no-slip model. Unconsolidated sand, having no adhesive bonding by cements, is much more likely to have a situation in between the two extreme cases as modelled by Walton (1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The AVA of BSRs is computed using the Zoeppritz equations [ Zoeppritz , ] with the elastic parameters estimated from the TPBE model for different gas hydrate saturations (Figure b). The presence of free gas below the BSR yields a large normal‐incidence reflection coefficient with class III AVA rather than class IV AVA [ Carcione and Tinivella , ; Sava and Hardage , ]; therefore, no free gas is assumed below the BSR for the TPBE model. The magnitude of the normal‐incidence reflection coefficient increases with hydrate saturation as the velocities of hydrate bearing sediments increase with hydrate saturation (Figure b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also been observed in cores to exist as laminae along specific horizons apparently controlled by bedding porosity and in massive deposits as fracture fill [18,19]. Hydrate accumulations have also been subdivided into four (4) basic classes based on simple geological features [5,20]: Class 1 accumulations consist of a hydrate zone with an underlying fluid zone consisting of gas and liquid water; Class 2 deposits consist of a hydrate zone which overlies a zone of mobile water; Class 3 deposits consist of a single hydrate layer with no underlying mobile fluids; and Class 4 refers to disperse, low saturation deposits which occur in oceanic sediments and which lack confining geologic strata.…”
Section: Classification Of Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%