2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92495-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rodent Sound Localization and Spatial Hearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, a clockwise-turn cell inhibiting a cell encoding counterclockwise posture). We reason such a circuit could facilitate sound localization by strongly encoding minute changes in head position, which inform the rat about the position of the head and ears relative to the ground (Lauer et al 2018). Gravity-relative head orientation may be of particular importance for animals with ear flaps, as such signals would convey the reliability of information arriving at each sensor ( i.e., ear), given their dissimilar concealment during natural motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, a clockwise-turn cell inhibiting a cell encoding counterclockwise posture). We reason such a circuit could facilitate sound localization by strongly encoding minute changes in head position, which inform the rat about the position of the head and ears relative to the ground (Lauer et al 2018). Gravity-relative head orientation may be of particular importance for animals with ear flaps, as such signals would convey the reliability of information arriving at each sensor ( i.e., ear), given their dissimilar concealment during natural motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this could be that we only corrected the average ILD across the frequency range of 5-80 kHz. Because ILDs are a function of frequency, and can be as high as ±30 dB in a high-frequency range ( Fig S1c, d), the ILD elimination stimulus may have had a remaining ILD in the high-frequency range that can be utilized by neurons (as suggested in a review study 16 ). Therefore, we conducted two additional experiments to clarify the role of ILDs in RF formation.…”
Section: Responses Of Sc Neurons To Monaural or Extended Ild Stimuli mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, passive studies might physically restrain the subject (Recanzone et al ., 2000; Lauer, Slee and May, 2011; Coen et al ., 2023), train them to hold still during the sound (Lomber and Malhotra, 2008; Lingner, Wiegrebe and Grothe, 2012; Town and Bizley, 2022), or use sounds so brief that they terminate before the subject can move (Kelly, 1980; Kavanagh and Kelly, 1987; Kacelnik et al ., 2006; Nodal et al ., 2010; Nodal, Bajo and King, 2012). For example, (Kelly, 1980) writes “Brief stimuli [were used] to eliminate the possibility of scanning movements of the head or body as a localization strategy.” Such approaches remove motor feedback in order to expose the precise sensory cues that animals can use to compute sound location (Goodman, Benichoux and Brette, 2013), as well as the underlying brainstem and cortical neural circuitry (Knudsen, 2002; Konishi, 2003; Grothe, Pecka and McAlpine, 2010; Keating and King, 2015; Lauer, Engel and Schrode, 2018; Middlebrooks, 2021). Our approach differs in three important ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, mice were significantly better at seeking out low-frequency sounds. This was unexpected because mice localizing sound rely mostly on interaural level differences, which are more prominent at high frequencies (Lauer, Engel and Schrode, 2018). (The mouse head is too small to exploit the other main binaural cue, interaural timing differences.)…”
Section: Mice Were Better Able To Seek Out Sounds With High Repetitio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation