2011
DOI: 10.3935/rsp.v18i2.998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rodne razlike u obiteljskim ulogama, zadovoljstvu i doživljaju pravednosti s obzirom na tradicionalnost stava

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the entire scale in both forms on the entire sample, as well as on subsamples, was high with α values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 for the participant's own expression of love and 0.94 to 0.96 for the partner's expression of love. (Bartolac et al, 2011) is a scale which assesses the degree to which a person's needs and wishes are fulfilled in a sexual relationship with a partner. The questionnaire consists of six items (e.g.…”
Section: Need For Affect Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reliability of the entire scale in both forms on the entire sample, as well as on subsamples, was high with α values ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 for the participant's own expression of love and 0.94 to 0.96 for the partner's expression of love. (Bartolac et al, 2011) is a scale which assesses the degree to which a person's needs and wishes are fulfilled in a sexual relationship with a partner. The questionnaire consists of six items (e.g.…”
Section: Need For Affect Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the model of adjustment in romantic relationships, the second domain consists of variables representing a persons' perception of partner interactions (Huston, 2000). This study includes three such variables: perception of love (Hendrick & Hendrick, 1997), ways of showing love (Huić, Kamenov, Jugović, & Huston, 2010), and quality of sexual interaction (Bartolac, Kamenov, & Petrak, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U drugim istraživanjima bliskih odnosa i partnerstva teme su uključivale: atribuciju partnerova negativnog ponašanja i kvalitetu braka (Ćubela i Rakić, 2001); taktike samopredstavljanja muškaraca i žena ovisno o vrsti odnosa s ciljnom osobom (Jelić i Ištok-Novak, 2014); kvalitetu i stabilnost odnosa u funkciji podjele moći u odlučivanju i obiteljskih obaveza Bartolac i Kamenov, 2011; partnerske odnose u kontekstu roda i rodnih uloga, iskustva rodno neravnopravnog odnosa u obitelji (Kamenov, Huić i Jugović, 2011); međukulturnu stabilnost prediktora bračnog zadovoljstva koje je pokazalo da postoji malo sličnosti između hrvatskih i iranskih parova (Tadinac, Bajoghli, Joshagani, Hromatko, Jelić i Kamenov, 2012); odnos između osobina ličnosti i privrženosti partnerima (Marušić, Kamenov i Jelić, 2006;Jozić, Milas i Mlačić, 2011).…”
Section: Bliski Odnosi Partnerstvo I Privrženostunclassified
“…According to the social role theory (Eagly, 1987), gender norms (that are determined by biological sex and power differentials) create certain expectations about the roles, responsibilities, and behaviours of men and women that otherwise have no biological justification. In heterosexual couples, the division of responsibilities has been traditionally demarcated along gender roles based on biological sex (Bartolac, Kamenov and Petrak, 2011). Same-sex couples violate this gendered structure within the family and face more prejudice, especially individuals who demonstrate cross-gender compared to gender-typical behaviours (Lehavot and Lambert, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%