1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01059439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding in disopyramide disposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MOULD, G. & DOLLERY, C.T. (1979 (Ward & Kinghorn, 1976) and non-linear behaviour has been reported, with some authors maintaining that dose-dependency can be explained by variations in plasma protein binding (Hinderling & Garrett, 1976;Meffin, Robert, Winkle, Harapat, Peters & Harrison, 1979), while others consider this aspect to be insufficient to explain the evidence (Cunningham, Shen, Shudo & Azarnoff, 1977Ilett, Madsen & Woods, 1979). Adding to the difficulty of answering the latter feature, there may be considerable variation in the extent of plasma binding between patients (Meffin et al, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MOULD, G. & DOLLERY, C.T. (1979 (Ward & Kinghorn, 1976) and non-linear behaviour has been reported, with some authors maintaining that dose-dependency can be explained by variations in plasma protein binding (Hinderling & Garrett, 1976;Meffin, Robert, Winkle, Harapat, Peters & Harrison, 1979), while others consider this aspect to be insufficient to explain the evidence (Cunningham, Shen, Shudo & Azarnoff, 1977Ilett, Madsen & Woods, 1979). Adding to the difficulty of answering the latter feature, there may be considerable variation in the extent of plasma binding between patients (Meffin et al, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steinhardt & Reynolds (1969) have described the problems with this approach and have stated that the only reliable way of assuring true equilibrium is to obtain the same bound and free drug concentrations when the drug is initially placed on either side. Meffin et al (1979) have stated that there is large inter-patient variability of disopyramide binding in patients with cardiac disease. Our results do not support this contention in healthy volunteers; indeed, for a biological phenomenon, there is surprising conformity (Figure 3) Myocardial infarction appears to decrease disopyramide binding in the therapeutic range, but this would not have been inferred when comparing the data of Meffin et al (1979) with previous workers (Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One side of the cell contained isotonic Krebs Ringers bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) with various concentrations of unlabelled disopyramide (range 0 to 9.25 ,ug/ml) and 0. (Meffin et al, 1979;Wilding et al, 1977). However, for the reasons presented here, we feel that the specific activity method can be used to accurately calculate CPequ and is as valid as measuring CPequ by conventional analytical methods, but simpler and less prone to analytical error than the latter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Each sample was assayed in duplicate and the mean value was utilized to construct plasma-level response curves. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of DQ were determined in a previous study (Regazzi-Bonora et al, 1982) while those of D were taken from the literature (Hulting and Jansson, 1977;Meffin et al, 1979). …”
Section: Blood Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%