1992
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199209000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Contrast Agent Perfusion and of Diffusion in the NMR Signal Enhancement of Liver Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
0
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the voxels with time-to-peak concentration in the third and fourth quartiles of the data tended to be those with K trans values near 0. This was expected, as voxels with late time-to-peak concentration are likely poorly-perfused and receive contrast agent largely through passive diffusion from neighboring voxels; results that are consistent with those previously reported (Jia et al, 2008, Pellerin et al, 2007, Marchal et al, 1992). The results from the experimental data show that the DTK model returns lower values for v e in the regions of the tumor with continuous and late delivery of CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the voxels with time-to-peak concentration in the third and fourth quartiles of the data tended to be those with K trans values near 0. This was expected, as voxels with late time-to-peak concentration are likely poorly-perfused and receive contrast agent largely through passive diffusion from neighboring voxels; results that are consistent with those previously reported (Jia et al, 2008, Pellerin et al, 2007, Marchal et al, 1992). The results from the experimental data show that the DTK model returns lower values for v e in the regions of the tumor with continuous and late delivery of CA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Cet effet T1 se rnanifeste essentiellement lors du skjour intravasculaire du produit. I1 rend donc compte de I'etat de la vascularisation du tissu observe (Josephson et al, 1988;Gore et Majurndar, 1990;Majurndar et al, 1990;Marchal et al, 1992). L'hyposignal du foie sain (contraste nCgatif) qui succede a cette phase correspond a un effet de susceptibilite rnagnetique du produit, mieux caractCrisC ?…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Pour les 5 lapins du lot 11, quelque soit la sequence d'imagerie, il n'y a pas de diffkrence significative (ns) d'intensitk du signal entre le foie sain et le foie ischkmique T1 2 SE T2 t SE TF Foie sain 517 2 23 239 2 30 71 2 10 Foie ischkmique 529 2 19ns 233 2 2411s 77 2 lOns l'aide de sCquences pond6rCes en T2. Cet effet est plus marquC lors de la localisation intracellulaire du produit Majumdar et al, 1990;Marchal et al, 1992). Comme I'AMI 25 est captC par les cellules de Kupffer, cet effet T2 rend compte de I'intCgritC du systeme rkticulohistiocytaire.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified