2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Culture in Rural Transformation in Manding Village, Bantul Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar examples from elsewhere in Africa, Asia and Latin America are documented in the literature (e.g., Forstner 2013;Pudianti et al 2016;Hieu and Rasovska 2017), with communities functioning as nodes in a transnational market for 'ethnic' art, crafts and fashions, whilst 'maintaining and re-creating a supposed "traditional identity" strongly linked to local places' (Aguayo 2008, p. 546). Yet, even as traditional local identity is foregrounded, the localities concerned are transformed by the connection into translocal networks and the reorganisation of production systems, including tendencies towards mechanisation and industrialisation to meet demand and remain competitive (Kimura 2011;Gough and Rigg 2012).…”
Section: Artisan Crafts Culture Economies and Rural Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar examples from elsewhere in Africa, Asia and Latin America are documented in the literature (e.g., Forstner 2013;Pudianti et al 2016;Hieu and Rasovska 2017), with communities functioning as nodes in a transnational market for 'ethnic' art, crafts and fashions, whilst 'maintaining and re-creating a supposed "traditional identity" strongly linked to local places' (Aguayo 2008, p. 546). Yet, even as traditional local identity is foregrounded, the localities concerned are transformed by the connection into translocal networks and the reorganisation of production systems, including tendencies towards mechanisation and industrialisation to meet demand and remain competitive (Kimura 2011;Gough and Rigg 2012).…”
Section: Artisan Crafts Culture Economies and Rural Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The recent proliferation of artisan craft workshops and businesses has emphasised their more artistic outputs as part of rural culture economies, sometimes tapping into embedded local traditions of specialist craft making, but in many cases involving the hybridisation of products, styles and techniques and the production of generic 'rustic' artefacts (Kneafsey et al 2001;Mayes 2010;Fox Miller 2017;Mitchell and Shannon 2018). Elsewhere, in Africa, Asia, Latin America and parts of Eastern Europe, artisan craft production has persisted as a mainstream part of rural economies, including in specialist 'craft villages', only more recently encountering pressures to restructure, modernise and engage new markets (Rogerson 1986;Eyferth 2003Eyferth , 2009Kimura 2011;Gough and Rigg 2012;Mahanty and Dang 2015;Chu 2016;Pudianti et al 2016). As in Europe, such dynamics may form part of neo-endogenous rural development strategies based on the commodification of local cultural resources as 'authentic' ethnic artefacts for export to niche markets (Aguayo 2008;Forstner 2013) or to attract tourism (Hieu and Rasovska 2017), but they can also involve processes of industrialisation and deterritorialisation as production is reoriented towards mass manufacture of low-cost commodities for export (Kimura 2011;Gough and Rigg 2012;Chu 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dengan kata lain, ada aspek tangible dan intangible cultures (Rudwiarti, Pudianti, & Vitasurya, 2019) yang digunakan sebagai magnet atau daya tarik wisata kampung-kota dan desa wisata. Bahkan, budaya memiliki peran penting dalam transformasi kehidupan kampung menjadi kampungwisata, seperti terjadi pada desa wisata Manding, Bantul (Pudianti, Syahbana, & Suprapti, 2016). Artinya, semua potensi fisik, sosial, budaya dilestarikan, dikembangkan dan diangkat menjadi elemen utama pembangunan ekonomi kawasan.…”
Section: Kriteria Kampung Sejahtera Kreatif Cerdas Dan Lestariunclassified
“…This study focuses on how villagers defend themselves from external influences which are not in favor of environmental sustainability, but the scope of this study is at the level of the rural area as a whole and not on the details of the settlement component in micro level. But on the topic of cultural tourism the most recent studies has been done such as Ahebwa, Aporu and Nyakaana (2016), Liu (2006), Van-Deursen and Raaphorst (2014) and Pudianti, Syahbana and Suprapti (2016) focusing on the relation between it with the sustainable cultural heritage management and the role of community participation. Differ from the previous studies of cultural tourism point of view, this study focussing on the quality of cultural asset itself which consists of tangible and intangible culture.…”
Section: Literature Review Previous Study Related To Research Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%