Role of FATF on financial systems of countries: successes and challenges

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the extent of successes and challenges of adoption and implementation of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) codes in member states by highlighting the influence of the FATF anti-money laundering policy framework on money laundering (ML) and the way forward in heightening the fight against the fast-evolving nature of ML and terrorist financing activities. Design/methodology/approach This paper, based on a purely qualitative desktop study, is drawn on historical information from FATF’s recommendations, its periodic reports, publications and other secondary sources such as books, journal articles on financial systems and scholarly literature. Findings The challenges found include difficulty in domestic coordination, capacity constraints of countries, inadequate operational resources and assessment complexities in the implementation of FATF standards. Nonetheless, FATF has chalked some successes such as the harmonization of legislation and enforcement efforts through the provision of coordination points. Other successes include flexibility in response to new threats, adoption of the mutual evaluation process, which advanced peer pressure on defaulting members, enhancement of the international financial space and the enhancement of the legitimization of FATF’s processes. Originality/value This paper provides a description of the successes and challenges of the FATF’s 40 + 9 recommendations since its establishment. The outcome would alert countries and players within the international financial space to invest more in capacity building and the entrenchment of the recommendations into their domestic laws.

Combating money laundering with machine learning – applicability of supervised-learning algorithms at cryptocurrency exchanges

“…Linking transactions to specific individuals or entities is difficult, which means that cryptocurrencies can facilitate the move, launder and hiding of funds from illegal activities (Adam and Fazekas, 2018). Cryptocurrencies pose a serious threat to AML efforts which has made supranational organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the EU join forces to develop new techniques to combat money laundering (Canhoto, 2021; Nanyun and Nasiri, 2021). The European Banking Authority (EBA) have noted that cryptocurrencies can be misused for tax evasion, money laundering, regulation avoidance and illegal trade of weapons or drugs, among other illicit practices (EBA, 2014; Maupin, 2017).…”

“…The European Banking Authority (EBA) have noted that cryptocurrencies can be misused for tax evasion, money laundering, regulation avoidance and illegal trade of weapons or drugs, among other illicit practices (EBA, 2014; Maupin, 2017). Even when criminal activities are detected, enforcement against cross-border jurisdictions is difficult, making cryptocurrency use for illegal purposes a global challenge in terms of monitoring and law enforcement (Buchanan, 2004; Nanyun and Nasiri, 2021).…”

Effective horizon management in transnational administration: Bespoke and box‐ticking consultancies in anti‐money laundering

“…Drawing on my participant observation, Table 1, below, identifies the main elements as resources, political buy‐in, long‐term horizon management, and coordination. All require significant administrative capacity (Nanyun & Nasiri, 2020). 5…”

“…Drawing on my participant observation, Table 1, below, identifies the main elements as resources, political buy-in, long-term horizon management, and coordination. All require significant administrative capacity (Nanyun & Nasiri, 2020). 5 These narratives of success take on the language of good governance, asking the policy audience to accept findings at face value as parsimonious and plausible (Halliday, 2018).…”

The impact of blacklists on external deposits: one size does not fit all

“…In his case study of the 311 blacklisting of Macau's Banco Delta Asia, Gaylord (2008) demonstrates that bankruns following blacklisting severely impacted the institution's deposit base. Overall, literature reviews repeatedly emphasize the importance of blacklists (particularly the FATF NCCT list and its subsequent "grey list"), but also the centrality of OFCs for hiding and disguising illicit financial flows (Nayun and Nasiri, 2020;Murrar and Barakat, 2020;Collin et al, 2016;Tiwari et al, 2020).…”