2007
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.095117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of home visiting in improving parenting and health in families at risk of abuse and neglect: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

Abstract: This intervention may have the potential to improve parenting and increase the identification of infants at risk of abuse and neglect in vulnerable families. Further investigation is needed, along with long-term follow-up to assess possible sleeper effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
170
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peer group is nevertheless clearly a crucial resource in helping many HVs formulate their difficult cases. Internationally, there have been many initiatives designed to help HVs provide support to families with difficulties in parent-child relationships (for example Barlow et al 2007;Collins & Reinke 1997;Emond et al 2002;Hewitt & Crawford 1988;McIntosh & Shute 2007;Olds 2002;Sanders et al 2003). There are however far fewer reports of how best to target the delivery of these interventions effectively towards those families who could gain most from them, and most of these have been based on simple demographics -for example Olds' seminal work on intensive home visitation was aimed at a target group of mothers who were in their teens, unmarried or living in deprived areas (Olds et al 1998b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peer group is nevertheless clearly a crucial resource in helping many HVs formulate their difficult cases. Internationally, there have been many initiatives designed to help HVs provide support to families with difficulties in parent-child relationships (for example Barlow et al 2007;Collins & Reinke 1997;Emond et al 2002;Hewitt & Crawford 1988;McIntosh & Shute 2007;Olds 2002;Sanders et al 2003). There are however far fewer reports of how best to target the delivery of these interventions effectively towards those families who could gain most from them, and most of these have been based on simple demographics -for example Olds' seminal work on intensive home visitation was aimed at a target group of mothers who were in their teens, unmarried or living in deprived areas (Olds et al 1998b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors reported results from the same study at different follow-up time points in separate papers and several authors reported results from the same study in more than one paper. Sixteen [70][71][72]74,[76][77][78]80,[82][83][84][85]87,89,90 (73%) included studies were RCTs, two 73,81 (9%) were non-RCTs, one 86 (5%) was a partially randomised study with two randomised intervention arms and one non-randomised control arm, two 75,88 (9%) were CBA studies and one 79 (5%) was a quasi-RCT. Four studies 73,75,81,88 used clustered allocation.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies 73,75,81,88 used clustered allocation. Thirteen studies [72][73][74][78][79][80]82,84,85,[88][89][90] [70][71][72]74,75,[77][78][79]81,[83][84][85]90 recruited socioeconomically disadvantaged participants.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations