2011
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of inflammation in oral carcinogenesis (Part I): Histological grading of malignancy using a binary system

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of the present study was to assess the suppressant role of the inflammatory infiltrate in oral carcinogenesis through the immunohistochemical expression of CD8 and FOXP3 and to discuss how representative this expression proved, as well as other parameters considered to be of prognostic value. A total of 20 cases of oral epithelial dysplasia and 40 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma were selected. The criteria suggested by the World Health Organization were used for the histological grading… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency might be explained by the subjectiveness attributed to some parameters of this grading system, which result in high intra‐ and interexaminer variability (Sawair et al , ). Moreover, immaturity cannot be used for the assessment of cellular pleomorphism, as suggested in Bryne's grading system, as it is manifest in the course of the differentiation process and most cells are immature at the invasive front (Piva et al , ). The results of this study revealed no association between the MG system and outcome of OSCC patients, similar to previously reported findings (Silveira et al , ; Lindenblatt et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inconsistency might be explained by the subjectiveness attributed to some parameters of this grading system, which result in high intra‐ and interexaminer variability (Sawair et al , ). Moreover, immaturity cannot be used for the assessment of cellular pleomorphism, as suggested in Bryne's grading system, as it is manifest in the course of the differentiation process and most cells are immature at the invasive front (Piva et al , ). The results of this study revealed no association between the MG system and outcome of OSCC patients, similar to previously reported findings (Silveira et al , ; Lindenblatt et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LHR is considered to be an attempt by the organism to eradicate tumor cells, in other words, it has an anti‐tumoral effect, and indeed evading immune destruction is considered to be one of the hallmarks of the cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, ). However, evidences have shown that immune and inflammatory cells might have protumoral effects (Piva et al , ; Dayan et al , ; Salo et al , ). This was particularly exemplified by subpopulations of CD4 T cells, which express CD25 and the transcription factor Foxp3 (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) and are termed regulatory T cells (Treg), which plays important roles in suppression of tumor‐specific immunity and in promotion of tumor development (Chaudhary et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) were used for the histological grading of the dysplasia (17). Carcinomas were classified as stage I (low-grade) or stage II (high-grade) according to the method proposed by Piva et al (18). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,33] As the histopathological features vary between different regions within the same OSCC, and as histopathological grading is subjective with low reproducibility, the information gained from a single biopsy, particularly if it has been taken from a superficial part of the tumor cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the future clinical behavior of the tumor. [32,34] However, it has become clear that the histopathological information gained from multiple biopsies taken from different parts of the invasive front of the cancer has a more significant prognostic value.…”
Section: Sd = Standard Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%