2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1328-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of intensive nutrition support and prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy during concomitant chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer

Abstract: These results suggest that INS in addition to prophylactic PEG not only decreases adverse effects but also may potentially improve oncological outcome of the patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated by CCRT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutritional intervention has been reported to improve mucositis and is effective during postoperative treatment. 33 In contrast, the reduced SMI was not a risk factor for a low FOIS score, possibly due to the low prevalence of sarcopenia during hospitalization in the present study. However, prolonged dysphagia after discharge sometimes results in reduced body weight and flap atrophy and would further exacerbate dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Nutritional intervention has been reported to improve mucositis and is effective during postoperative treatment. 33 In contrast, the reduced SMI was not a risk factor for a low FOIS score, possibly due to the low prevalence of sarcopenia during hospitalization in the present study. However, prolonged dysphagia after discharge sometimes results in reduced body weight and flap atrophy and would further exacerbate dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Similar to our data, Takahasi et al showed that PEG tube placement constituted a practicable nutritional intervention with quite a few benefits, such as effective reduction of treatment-related weight loss with stable weight at the end of RT: median weight at PEG tube placement was 67.4 vs 67.3 kg at the end of RT. 34 These data underscore the importance of monitoring the nutritional status of HNC patients, indicating that timing is important as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As Diretrizes de Câncer da Sociedade Clínica da Austrália sobre Nutrição do Câncer de Cabeça e Pescoço 26 indicam que o aumento da intensidade de supervisão dietética leva à menor perda de peso, a menos interrupções no tratamento, a menores números de internações não planejadas e à melhor transição para dieta oral pós-tratamento 26 . Outro estudo realizado no Hospital Universitário de Kobe, no Japão, com pacientes com câncer de orofaringe em quimiorradioterapia, em terapia nutricional intensiva e uso de gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea, revelou aumento da ingestão de calorias, redução de efeitos adversos e dosagem completa de cisplatina, sugerindo que o suporte nutricional intensivo pode contribuir para melhores resultados em pacientes oncológicos 27 . Em estudo longitudinal, realizado em Taiwan, com pacientes oncológicos internados, resultados mostraram que pelo menos três atendimentos nutricionais aumentaram efetivamente o consumo de calorias e preservaram o peso corporal 28 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified