2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of interface morphology in the exchange-spring behavior of FePt/Fe perpendicular bilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A wealth of different soft/hard materials has been investigated in the literature (see, e.g., [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). Experimentally, the Fe/FePt system is a highly suitable system for studying the fundamental properties of nano-composite magnetic systems as the properties are relatively easy to control [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wealth of different soft/hard materials has been investigated in the literature (see, e.g., [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). Experimentally, the Fe/FePt system is a highly suitable system for studying the fundamental properties of nano-composite magnetic systems as the properties are relatively easy to control [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1(b) also evidences that the two films with the highest Fe content have the largest magnetization at 2 T and show the softest magnetic properties in all the analyzed composition range. Therefore, we decided to focus on Fe 75 Pt 25 and Fe 80 Pt 20 as soft phase compositions and grew two soft/hard samples series differing in the soft phase nominal composition (Table I). Sample series with the same thickness and composition were grown on both MgO and STO substrates (Table I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) measurements on films with this nominal composition gave Fe 4663 Pt 5463 . As reported in Table I, two different series of composite samples were grown on each substrate; the series differ in the soft phase nominal composition, i.e., Fe 75 Pt 25 and Fe 80 Pt 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…В качестве одного из слоев боль-шое внимание привлекают магнитоупорядоченные тон-кие пленки FePt, являющиеся перспективным мате-риалом для магнитотвердого слоя в носителях ин-формации вследствие большой кристаллографической анизотропии (∼ 7 · 10 7 erg/cm 3 ) [1,3]. В последние го-ды проведен ряд теоретических [4][5][6] и эксперимен-тальных исследований многослойных систем на осно-ве FePt, например L1 0 -FePt/CoCrPt [7], магнитожест-ких сплавов FePtCu и многослойных пленок Co/Pt [8], пленок L1 0 -FePt/FeRh [9], L1 0 -FePt/TiN [10], обменно-связанных магнитных нанокомпозитов FePt/Fe 3 Pt [11] и FePt/FePt 3 [12], тонких пленок FePt/BN [13] и L1 0 -FePt/Fe [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Среди исследуемых материалов мно-гослойная система FePt/Fe отличается малой константой магнитокристаллической анизотропии и большой поля-ризацией магнитного насыщения Fe, что может привести к значительному повышению остаточной намагниченно-сти обменно-связанных магнитотвердых/магнитомягких двухслойных систем [14,22].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified