1977
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.45.6.987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of physical attractiveness in peer attribution of psychological disturbance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, given their greater perceived maturity (Berscheid & Walster, 1974), self-direction (Miller, 1970), and employment potential, the attractive applicants were seen as more capable of resolving their own career goals and as less needy of guidance than other applicants. This interpretation is consistent with the findings of other research (Cash, Kehr, Polyson, & Freeman, 1977) that therapeutic guidance is recommended as less neces-sary for attractive than for unattractive individuals to resolve identical psychological difficulties.…”
Section: Alternatives To Employmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Perhaps, given their greater perceived maturity (Berscheid & Walster, 1974), self-direction (Miller, 1970), and employment potential, the attractive applicants were seen as more capable of resolving their own career goals and as less needy of guidance than other applicants. This interpretation is consistent with the findings of other research (Cash, Kehr, Polyson, & Freeman, 1977) that therapeutic guidance is recommended as less neces-sary for attractive than for unattractive individuals to resolve identical psychological difficulties.…”
Section: Alternatives To Employmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although sometimes traits attributed to the handicapped may be positive (Comer and Piliavin 1972), for the most part physically stigmatized individuals are likely to provoke negative emotions (Cash et al 1977); interactions between the physically stigmatized and others are often strained and tensionproducing (Goffman 1963;Jones et al 1984;Kleck 1968;Richardson et al 1961). Also, the physically stigmatized are often the victims of overt discrimination (Dietz, Littman, and Bentley 1984;Grey and Ashmore 1976;Piliavin, Piliavin, and Rodin 1975).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown unattractive defendants were evaluated with more certainty of guilt and assigned harsher punishments than attractive individuals in both simulated and actual trials (Efran, 1974; Mazzella & Feingold, 1994). Furthermore, attractiveness seems to influence the perception of a person’s mental health; when participants were presented with an audio recording of a staged psychological interview with a person and were either shown a photo of an unattractive individual, a photo of an attractive individual, or no accompanying photo, participants who were shown the unattractive photo attributed greater maladjustment and disturbances with a poorer prognosis to that person than the other conditions (Cash, Kehr, Polyson, & Freeman, 1977). Given these findings that highlight the effects if unattractiveness, it makes sense why there was an even greater inclination to associate negative traits together (i.e., unattractive voices with unattractive faces) than there was to associate positive traits together (i.e., attractive voices with attractive faces).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%