2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of portal haemodynamic parameters in prediction of oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different predictors for the detection of OVs with variable degrees of accuracy were evaluated; including laboratory and imaging techniques. Doppler US for hepatic hemodynamic also was evaluated in this field [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different predictors for the detection of OVs with variable degrees of accuracy were evaluated; including laboratory and imaging techniques. Doppler US for hepatic hemodynamic also was evaluated in this field [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it can be used to stage the disease as early or late cirrhosis. Further analytical studies may confirm the use of congestion index as a significant prognostic factor in the evaluation of several liver diseases (Yin XY, Lu MD, Huang JF, Xie XY, Liang LJ, 2016, Kayacetin E, Efe D, & Doğan C, 2016, Mahmoud HS, Mostafa EF, & Mohammed MAW, 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Accordingly, alternative diagnostic modalities, which are readily available and well-tolerated, should be actively explored. Several alternative methods for predicting the presence of EVs in liver cirrhosis have been proposed, including computed tomography (CT) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), magnetic resonance (MR) (3), serum markers (9)(10)(11), ultrasonographic parameters (12)(13)(14), liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (15)(16)(17), spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) (15,17,18), platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PSR) (19,20) and capsule endoscopy (21,22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, SPI and CI have higher diagnostic accuracy. Their sensitivity and specificity were greater than 80% (12)(13)(14); (4) SSM has a higher diagnosis accuracy than LSM and PSR (15,17). The sensitivity and specificity of SSM were 78% and 76%, respectively (18); (5) the sensitivity and specificity of capsule endoscopy for the presence of EV were 73.7% and 90.5%, respectively (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%