Role of Psychological and Structural Empowerment in the Relationship between Teachers’ Psychological Capital and Their Levels of Burnout

Abstract

* Tabloda yer alan tüm değerler standardize edilmiş beta (β) katsayılarıdır. ** Tüm değerlerin anlamlılık düzeyi p < .01 olarak hesaplanmıştır. *** Toplam etki için anlamlılık testi yapılmamıştır.

Profiles of Burnout, Coping Strategies and Depressive Symptomatology

“…It is also essential to proactively identify and gratify student needs so that the emergence or worsening of problem situations can be prevented. Problem situations can cause stress (Nizielski et al, 2013;Kaya and Altınkurt, 2018), exhaustion, a loss of enthusiasm (Aldrup et al, 2018;Aparisi et al, 2019), or even the abandonment of the teaching profession (Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2018;Chambers Mack et al, 2019) among teachers. Most importantly, it is essential for policy makers to reconceptualize the roles of teachers by realistically restructuring their workload and clarifying their responsibilities (Carlotto and Câmara, 2019;De Carlo et al, 2019;Molero et al, 2019).…”

Turkish Adaptation of Preschool Children’s Science Motivation Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

“…Accordingly, Shore and Tetrick (1991) stated in their study that they used the .80 criterion for NFI based on the view that the value of .90 suggested by Tanaka (1987) could be very assertive. Similarly, in the study conducted by Kaya and Altinkurt (2018), the researchers stated that they took the value of .85 for the NFI cut-off point. Parallel to this, for the NFI value, researchers can accept values of .80 and above as the cut-off point as an indicator of good fit (Kaya & Altinkurt, 2018;Kilis & Yildirim, 2018;Kizildag & Yildirim, 2017).…”

“…The goodness fit index (AGFI) value arranged in CFA is over .80 (Cole, 1987;Marsh & Balla, 1994), the goodness fit index (GFI) value is over .90 (Hair et al, 2010;Kline, 1994) corresponds to good fit. Although the normed fit index (NFI) value of .90 and above indicates good fit (Bentler & Bonnet, 1980), the cut-off value of .85 is also accepted in the literature (Kaya & Altinkurt, 2018;Shore & Tetrick, 1991). A comparative fit index (CFI) value above .95 is an indicator of perfect fit (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2014).…”

Caracterización del capital psicológico en el profesorado: una revisión sistemática

“…Por último, el capital psicológico predice la salud mental y física, representa un factor protector frente a la depresión y reduce el estrés (Demir, 2018;Soykan et al, 2019;Shen et al, 2014;Sood, 2017). Es más, son múltiples los estudios que resaltan el papel protector del capital psicológico frente al burnout en profesorado de todas las etapas educativas (Adil y Kamal, 2018; Cheung et al, 2011;Demir, 2018;Ferradás et al, 2019;Hansen et al, 2015;Kaya y Altınkurt, 2018;Li, Li et al, 2019;Mesurado y Laudadío, 2019;Peng et al, 2019;Pu, 2017;Rehman et al, 2017;. En esta línea, Ferradás et al (2019) establecieron diferentes perfi les de profesorado en función de los niveles para cada componente del capital psicológico y concluyeron que los niveles más bajos de burnout se observan en profesorado con un perfi l de alto capital psicológico; es decir, con altos niveles de esperanza, efi ciencia, resiliencia y optimismo.…”

“…El capital psicológico también se relaciona con diversas variables psicológicas y organizacionales positivas, como el crecimiento personal, el comportamiento cívico laboral, el comportamiento organizacional afectivo y el empoderamiento (Aftab et al, 2018;Kaya y Altınkurt, 2018;Polizzi y Claro, 2019). Además, se asocia con el empleo de estrategias positivas de afrontamiento del estrés (Soykan et al, 2019; y con estrategias de afrontamiento del trabajo emocional (Peng et al, 2019).…”