With the approval of Institutional Board and Local Ethic Committee (KA/0250), 53 patients (28 male, 25 female) of 268 patients (149 males, 119 females) regarded as high risk cases for stone recurrences were evaluated for 5 years, prospectively. These 53 patients attended routine controls in the 5 year period. The mean age of the patients was 46 (3-71) years. The patients underwent SWL, URS, PNL, open surgery or passed the stone spontaneously. One month later, all of the patients were checked for stone-free status by performing non-contrast spiral computerized tomography or intravenous urography. Stones were analysed by using X-ray diffractometry method. At the initial visit the patients were queried about the stone episodes, history of any surgery (gastrointestinal or genitourinary surgery), systemic diseases such as osteoporosis, sarcoidosis, etc., family history for urolithiasis, dietary methods and fluid intake, stone analysis, the age at the first episode and medication (Vit-D, calcium, etc).All of the cases were informed about the risks and recurrence rates of urolithiasis. The patients taking any drugs liable to cause urinary calculi; who have a history of any bowel surgery,
Research ArticleUrol Nephrol Open Access J 2017, 5(1): 00156
AbstractObjectives: Recurrence rates in urolithiasis may reach to 50% after 5-10 years. Simple metabolic evaluation (SE) is commonly used for evaluating patients with low risk for recurrence. In the present study, patients with high risk to develop for stone recurrence were evaluated by single sample of urine collected in 24 hours urination with standard diet.Methods: Two hunderd and sixty eight cases who were supposed to be patients with high risk for stone recurrence were evaluated. Fifty three patients who had routine follow up for 5 years were investigated. Calcium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, creatinine, BUN, uric acide, parathormone in blood and calcium, uric acide, magnesium, citrate, urine volume and oxalate in the sample of urine collected in 24 hours urination with standard diet were checked.Results: Metabolic abnormalities were determined in 87% of the patients. During the five years, more than 3 parameters corrupted in 9 (17%) and less than three parameters corrupted in 12 (23%) patients. In 5 (1%) patients the same parameters never changed. In 14 (26%) patients all of the parameters improved whereas at least one parameter recovered in 13 (25%) patients. Stone recurrence was seen in 2 (4%) patients.
Conclusion:Metabolic evaluation and preventive medical therapy are supplementary steps in the treatment of urolithiasis. We conclude that, although SE seems to be safe, inexpensive and easy to perform in the evaluation of patients with high risk to develop stone recurrence, the compliance of the patients may be the restrictive parameter for the success.