2000
DOI: 10.1128/.20.10.3331-3344.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Complex and Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Synergistic Activation of the Glycoprotein Hormone α Subunit Gene by Epidermal Growth Factor and Forskolin

Abstract: The aim of these studies was to elucidate a role for epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling in the transcriptional regulation of the glycoprotein hormone ␣ subunit gene, a subunit of chorionic gonadotropin. Studies examined the effects of EGF and the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin on the expression of a transfected ␣ subunit reporter gene in a human choriocarcinoma cell line (JEG3). At maximal doses, administration of EGF resulted in a 50% increase in a subunit reporter activity; forskolin administrati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, cAMP may interfere with the perhaps most important signaling cascade of the EGF receptor, the activation of ERK1 and ERK2 (12,28,60). However, in some cell systems cAMP-elevating agents do not interfere with EGF-induced activation of ERK1 and ERK2 (4,32) or they can even enhance EGF-dependent activation of these mitogen-activated protein kinases (48,61). As discussed above, recent studies that show that isoforms with different domain composition may even have an opposite response to certain stimulus illustrate how the cross talk between signaling systems can be cell type specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, cAMP may interfere with the perhaps most important signaling cascade of the EGF receptor, the activation of ERK1 and ERK2 (12,28,60). However, in some cell systems cAMP-elevating agents do not interfere with EGF-induced activation of ERK1 and ERK2 (4,32) or they can even enhance EGF-dependent activation of these mitogen-activated protein kinases (48,61). As discussed above, recent studies that show that isoforms with different domain composition may even have an opposite response to certain stimulus illustrate how the cross talk between signaling systems can be cell type specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4d, lane 3), suggesting that c‐Jun may be a member of the specific complex that binds to this site, in keeping with a similar result with the DYNCRE3 element (equivalent AP1/CRE site in prodynorphin gene promoter), which was also supershifted with a p‐c‐Jun antibody (Messersmith et al . 1996), and previous reports that c‐Jun can bind to both canonical AP1 and CRE consensus elements (Hai and Curran 1991; Roberson et al . 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In both cases, the CRE is located in proximity to a functional TATA box, which is a critical feature needed to confer a full response to cAMP agonists (22). In addition, both genes are similarly regulated by EGF, which acts synergistically with cAMP agonists through activation of a composite transcription factor module, consisting of CRE-binding protein, cJun, and cfos, which are activated and recruited to the CRE in a single complex (9,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the CRE-TATA unit, there are other important determinants of placental expression in the ␣CG promoter, such as CCAAT boxes, GATA elements, and upstream regulatory elements (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%