2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-1813-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the mesoamygdaloid dopamine projection in emotional learning

Abstract: Manipulations of amygdala dopamine impact the earliest stage of learning in which emotional reactions may be most prevalent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NBW females showed a higher DA concentration at the hippocampus than their male littermates. The release of DA, acting on many brain regions including hippocampus and amygdala, mainly influences reward‐related behavior (Packard and White, 1991; Phillips et al, 2010). Hence, the higher levels of DA found in the female NBW piglets of the current study may give more data supporting a better survival and developmental traits of the female sex, as previously found in other studies (Aiken and Ozanne 2013; Moritz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NBW females showed a higher DA concentration at the hippocampus than their male littermates. The release of DA, acting on many brain regions including hippocampus and amygdala, mainly influences reward‐related behavior (Packard and White, 1991; Phillips et al, 2010). Hence, the higher levels of DA found in the female NBW piglets of the current study may give more data supporting a better survival and developmental traits of the female sex, as previously found in other studies (Aiken and Ozanne 2013; Moritz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DA influences reward-related behavior by acting on many brain regions including the prefrontal cortex (Hitchcott et al, 2007), rhinal cortex (Liu et al, 2004), hippocampus (Packard and White, 1991; Grecksch and Matties, 1981) and amygdala (Phillips et al, 2010). The effects of DA are likely to differ widely between these regions due to variations in the density of DA innervation, DA transporters, metabolic enzymes, autoreceptors, receptors, and receptor coupling to intracellular signaling pathways (Neve et al, 2004; Bentivoglio and Morelli, 2005; Frank and Fossella, 2010).…”
Section: Dopamine In Reward: Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DA in the prefrontal cortex appears to affect working memory and impulsivity (Goldman-Rakic, 1990; Dagher and Robbins, 2009; Cools and D’Esposito, 2011; Dalley et al, 2011) while in the amygdala it may be critical for the modulation of emotional learning (Lamont and Kokkinidis, 1998; Rosenkranz and Grace, 2002; Fadok et al, 2010; Phillips et al, 2010; Tye et al, 2010). Taken together, the effects of manipulation of the DA system clearly depend upon which DAergic projection is affected.…”
Section: Dopamine and Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%