2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2722-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 and Apa1 polymorphisms in prostate cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundVitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms affect the risk of prostate cancer. However, studies investigating the relationship between VDR gene polymorphisms (Cdx2 and ApaI) and prostate cancer risk are equivocal. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of all the studies to review the evidence available.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science for studies published until September 2015 was conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 19 prospective cohort or nested case-control studies suggested per 10 ng/ml increment in circulating 25[OH]D concentration, the risk of prostate cancer was approximately 4 % elevated [64]. Moreover, recent meta-analyses found the association between some race-related vitamin D receptors (VDR) polymorphisms (TaqI, FokI, Cdx2, ApaI, BsmI) and an increased risk of prostate cancer [65][66][67]. It should be noted that the seasonal variation might also affect the association found between the vitamin D and prostate cancer [68], since the sun exposure is the most important source regulator of serum vitamin D [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 19 prospective cohort or nested case-control studies suggested per 10 ng/ml increment in circulating 25[OH]D concentration, the risk of prostate cancer was approximately 4 % elevated [64]. Moreover, recent meta-analyses found the association between some race-related vitamin D receptors (VDR) polymorphisms (TaqI, FokI, Cdx2, ApaI, BsmI) and an increased risk of prostate cancer [65][66][67]. It should be noted that the seasonal variation might also affect the association found between the vitamin D and prostate cancer [68], since the sun exposure is the most important source regulator of serum vitamin D [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of various studies were disputable and contradictory (39,40). Most of the studies found no association between VDR polymorphism and prostate cancer (13,22), however, Nunes et al found correlation between CC genotype (TaqI) with age (>58 years old), and GG (BsmI) with lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (<10 ng/ml) (41). Aassociation between a significantly increased estimated chance of PSA <10 ng/ml with G allele (BsmI) and 9.75-fold increased chance of patients with prostate cancer having a lower PSA level with GG/GG genotype (BsmI/ApaI) was also found.…”
Section: Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aassociation between a significantly increased estimated chance of PSA <10 ng/ml with G allele (BsmI) and 9.75-fold increased chance of patients with prostate cancer having a lower PSA level with GG/GG genotype (BsmI/ApaI) was also found. Recently, various metaanalysis and case-control studies have been conducted to find a relation between VDR polymorphism (TaqI, FokI, Cdx2, ApaI, BsmI, rs731236, rs7975232, rs731236, rs1544410, rs3782905, rs1544410, and rs2239185) and risk of prostate cancer (11,13,18,22,(41)(42)(43)(44). VDR polymorphism FolkI, Cdx2, and ApaI were not found to have any association with an increased risk of prostate cancer.…”
Section: Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the global incidence is rising rapidly. By 2030, the number of new PCa and PCa-related deaths annually will climb to 1,853,391 and 544,209, respectively [ 2 ]. The etiology of PCa has remained unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%