2016
DOI: 10.1177/0093650215618759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role-Related Participation in Product Design Teams

Abstract: Organizations often delegate decision-making tasks to groups and teams. At issue is the extent to which participation during discussion reflects both individual-level characteristics and emergent (i.e., group-level) processes. Drawing upon Hewes's socio-egocentric model and team meeting literature, we used a multilevel approach to examine participation in product-design teams across a series of tasks. Findings indicate that participation consists of both intra-and group-level processes. Team members who were t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the meetings was for the groups to develop recommendations regarding ballot measures in Oregon. Part of the problem includes recognizing when to impose structure on the meetings in order for the group to “truly deliberate.” Bonito, Keyton, and Ervin (2015), examined participant trends over four meetings, with each meeting having a different focus or purpose. Participation at T1, as evidenced by the rather low intraclass correlation, consisted largely of individual-level (i.e., intrapersonal) processes but by T4 groups accounted for approximately 50% of the variance in participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the meetings was for the groups to develop recommendations regarding ballot measures in Oregon. Part of the problem includes recognizing when to impose structure on the meetings in order for the group to “truly deliberate.” Bonito, Keyton, and Ervin (2015), examined participant trends over four meetings, with each meeting having a different focus or purpose. Participation at T1, as evidenced by the rather low intraclass correlation, consisted largely of individual-level (i.e., intrapersonal) processes but by T4 groups accounted for approximately 50% of the variance in participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%