1972
DOI: 10.2307/2093455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role-Taking and Power in Social Psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some scholars have posited that power and perspectivetaking are at odds Thomas et al, 1972;Tjosvold & Sagaria, 1978). Power is characterized by selfinterest, whereas perspective-taking stems from a desire to 490031P SPXXX10.1177/0146167213490031<italic>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</italic>Gordon and Chen research-article2013 1 University of California, Berkeley, USA understand others.…”
Section: Are Power and Perspective-taking At Odds?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have posited that power and perspectivetaking are at odds Thomas et al, 1972;Tjosvold & Sagaria, 1978). Power is characterized by selfinterest, whereas perspective-taking stems from a desire to 490031P SPXXX10.1177/0146167213490031<italic>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</italic>Gordon and Chen research-article2013 1 University of California, Berkeley, USA understand others.…”
Section: Are Power and Perspective-taking At Odds?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers have documented that the powerless have a need to know the feeling and reactions of their superiors in order to respond accordingly and win favours (Hall, 1979 ;Miller, 1976 ;Thomas et al ., 1972 ;Weitz, 1976). The powerless person may speculate: What does my superior think?…”
Section: Explanation For the Power X Emotion Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exception is Forte (1998), who specifically examines the relationship between role-taking and social power in the context of social work. Reviewing literature from a range of disciplines, he explores variations of the "role-taking and power thesis," which posits that less powerful interactants are more motivated, and therefore more able, to role-take than their more powerful counterparts (Thomas, Franks, & Calonico, 1972;Goldstein & Michaels, 1985;Snodgrass, 1985;Yoels, Clair, Ritchey & Allman, 1993). Forte finds support for this thesis in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, social class, and organizational position: Domestics, for example, "are virtually invisible to their employers.…”
Section: Empathy and Social Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to gender, various researchers (e.g. Franklin, 1984;Thomas, Franks, & Calonico, 1972) have found that whereas men have role-taking abilities, they tend not to use them. " Schwalbe (1992) argues that sexual harassment is rooted in men's privilege-based insensitivity to women's concerns-for career advancement, for avoiding male retaliation, for dealing with a sense of violation, and for maintaining composure in difficult circumstances" (Forte,p.…”
Section: Empathy and Social Powermentioning
confidence: 99%