Roles of career maturity mediating the effects of locus of control and socioeconomic status on career readiness

Sholikah, Mar’atus; Muhyadi, Muhyadi

doi:10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21127

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(43 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The findings of this study suggest that students with a higher level of locus of control, particularly those with a strong internal locus of control, are more likely to demonstrate higher levels of work readiness. This aligns with previous research conducted by Setiawan & Yusnaini (2021), Jayanti et al (2021), Sholikah &Muhyadi (2021), andCholik et al (2022). These studies also reported a positive and significant influence of locus of control on work readiness.…”

Section: Modelsupporting

confidence: 91%

The Influence of Locus of Control and Industry Work Practice to Work Readiness

Kusumaningsih,

Purwana,

Suherdi

2023

MARGINAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Locus of control refers to an individual's belief in their ability to control and influence outcomes in their lives. It can be categorized as internal (personal control) or external (attributing outcomes to external factors). This study aims to investigate the impact of locus of control and industrial work practices on work readiness among twelfth-grade students at SMKN 50 Jakarta. The study uses a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis using IBM SPSS 24.0 software. A Likert scale questionnaire is used for the survey method. The accessible population for the study is 211 students, with a sample size of 138 students determined using the Slovin formula and a 5% margin of error. Proportionate stratified random sampling is used as the sampling technique. The data analysis procedure includes: 1.) Analysis of test requirements through normality and reliability tests; 2.) Examination of classical assumptions involving tests for multicollinearity and heteroscedasticity; 3.) Multiple regression analysis; 4.) Hypothesis testing using the F-test and T-test; and 5.) Evaluation of the coefficient of determination. The findings show a positive and significant influence between locus of control, industrial work practices, and job readiness. The coefficient of determination indicates that 41.0% of the variability is explained by the variables studied, while the remaining 59% is influenced by external factors beyond the scope of this study.

show abstract

Section: Modelsupporting

confidence: 91%

The Influence of Locus of Control and Industry Work Practice to Work Readiness

Kusumaningsih,

Purwana,

Suherdi

2023

MARGINAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, strategies to enhance career readiness have been identified. Indonesia Career readiness among low-income Muslim students [16] Malaysia The mediating role of career decision self-efficacy on the relationship of career emotional intelligence and self-esteem with career adaptability among university students [17] South Korea The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset between intolerance of uncertainty and career adaptability [18] Indonesia Roles of career maturity mediating the effects of locus of control and socioeconomic status on career readiness [19] China Proactive personality and career adaptability of Chinese female pre-service teachers in primary schools: the role of calling [1] UK Increasing students' career readiness through career guidance: measuring the impact with a validated measure [20] Indonesia…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing student career readiness: a two-decade systematic literature review

Rachmawati,

Sahid,

Mahmud

et al. 2024

IJERE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study intends to discover the elements that impact student career readiness growth, analyze the components that dominate that growth, and identify the factors that dominate student career readiness. The methods used to review selected articles are discussed including publication standards, databases, eligibility and exclusion criteria, stages of the review process (identification, screening, feasibility) as well as abstraction and analysis of data. By following the guidelines of item preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) to produce this review. Based on the commonalities and traits of the first identified components, these factors have been separated into two categories, internal and external. Self-efficacy factors for internal factors and job training factors for external factors are the two factors with the maximum frequency and dominance over the others. Pursuing formal and non-formal education relevant to the chosen career field, making short-term and long-term career plans, establishing a strong professional network, and seeking relevant work experience through internships, part-time jobs, or volunteer work are all components of a career readiness strategy. Develop the necessary skills for an industry or career field, improve your communication skills, think positively, and be willing to confront career challenges. Maintain a balance between personal and professional life.

show abstract