2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling bearing fault detection using continuous deep belief network with locally linear embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When P G (x) = 0, D * becomes 1 meaning that the discriminator can effectively recognize synthetic data, when P G (x) is close to P data (x), D * tends to the optimal value of 0.5, which means that synthetic data are indistinguishable from real data. Plugging in (17) into (15), one has: (18) As the objective of generative part is to shrink the distance between real and generated data, the loss function of generative model can be defined as…”
Section: Generative Adversarial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When P G (x) = 0, D * becomes 1 meaning that the discriminator can effectively recognize synthetic data, when P G (x) is close to P data (x), D * tends to the optimal value of 0.5, which means that synthetic data are indistinguishable from real data. Plugging in (17) into (15), one has: (18) As the objective of generative part is to shrink the distance between real and generated data, the loss function of generative model can be defined as…”
Section: Generative Adversarial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [16] proposed a real-time fault diagnosis model using a deep neural network. Shao et al [17] presented a continuous deep belief network (CDBN) for bearings fault detection. Shen et al [8] used a deep belief network with an optimized function of Nesterov momentum (NM) for bearing fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the available remaining life, the effective feature representation of several heath states is required. As proven by many pioneer works in previous studies, [14][15][16][17][18] deep learning techniques are good at extracting discriminative features directly from raw data. Therefore, we plan to exploit proper feature representation for two different health states: normal state and fast degradation.…”
Section: Deep Learning Feature Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work directly divided the degradation data of multiple bearings into training and test sets without specifying offline and online scenarios. Shao et al 17 used continuous deep belief network (CDBN) with locally linear embedding and deep stacked auto encoder (DSAE) 18 to detect the rolling bearing fault. Shao et al 19 utilized stacked auto encoder (SAE), CNN, and deep belief network (DBN) to extract deep features to further identify health states of bearings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL methods can automatically learn abstract representation features without manually selecting fault features , and yield the best-in-class performance [16]. Various DL algorithms have been used for REB fault diagnosis [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Chen et al [27] proposed a fusion method to fuse the vibration signals from time and frequency domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%