2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2007.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling-horizon and fix-and-relax heuristics for the parallel machine lot-sizing and scheduling problem with sequence-dependent set-up costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
41
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies that propose a relax-and-fix heuristic to solve optimization problems can be found in the literature. For example, relax-and-fix-based heuristics for solving lot sizing and scheduling problems were proposed in [28,[30][31][32][33][34]. The study [35] applied a relax-and-fix based heuristic to solve the travelling umpire problem, whereas Noor-E-Alam et al [36] applied the method to solve large-scale grid-based location, and Kjeldsen et al [37] optimize the production plan for power-generating companies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies that propose a relax-and-fix heuristic to solve optimization problems can be found in the literature. For example, relax-and-fix-based heuristics for solving lot sizing and scheduling problems were proposed in [28,[30][31][32][33][34]. The study [35] applied a relax-and-fix based heuristic to solve the travelling umpire problem, whereas Noor-E-Alam et al [36] applied the method to solve large-scale grid-based location, and Kjeldsen et al [37] optimize the production plan for power-generating companies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relax-and-fix heuristics were applied to different production planning problems including the capacitated single level multi-item lot sizing problem (Federgruen et al 2007), the multi-level lot sizing problem (Stadtler, 2003), and the lot sizing and scheduling problem with parallel machines (Beraldi et al, 2008). It was also used to solve problems in particular applications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the actual sugarcane harvesting planning, Higgins et al (2004b), Higgins & Laredo (2006), as well as Jena & Poggi (2013) proposed methods that aggregate harvest blocks in order to reduce the number of variables involved. In parallel, heuristic methods based on MIP, such as relax-and-fix, presented by Pochet & Wolsey (2006) and fix-and-optimize, proposed by Helber & Sahling (2010), have been widely used to solve the large scale General Lotsizing and Scheduling Problem for Parallel Production Lines, as shown for example in Beraldi et al (2008), Ferreira et al (2009Ferreira et al ( , 2012, Toso et al (2009) and Helber & Sahling (2010). Therefore, this work uses an MIP model to represent the programming and scheduling sugarcane harvesting front problem and proposes heuristic methods to solve this problem in real situations, comprising three integrated heuristics: a harvest block aggregation heuristic, a relax-and-fix constructive heuristic and a fix-and-optimize improvement heuristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%