1976
DOI: 10.2307/525786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roman Britain in 1975

Abstract: Plots 3 and 5 respectively) were excavated immediately west and east (FIG. 4) of the possible bath-house site, 8 and immediately south of the known fortlet. 9 The earliest feature was an Iron-Age type four-post structure of side 25 m on Plot 3. On Plot 5 (FIG. 5) the earliest feature was a pair of east-west military ditches which may be part of an auxiliary fort of Flavian date. Outside these was a north-south cobbled road, much disturbed, a slate-lined cistern (perhaps associated with the baths), an oven and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The burial deposit was donated to the Lincolnshire Museum (now The Collection) in 1953 but appears not to have been recorded by publication. Several years later two late second to mid-third century cremations, interred in cooking pots, were found approximately 100 m away (Goodburn et al 1976), and a fragment of a Roman tombstone was later recovered very close to the previous finds (White 1977 The total weight of all the cremated materials in the Broadway burial was 376 g with the total weight of the cremated bone 371 g. The latter value is substantially below the expected weight of a modern adult cremation (approximately 1000-2400 g), but is within the observed range of Romano-British cremation burials (McKinley 1993(McKinley , 2004b. At the time of analysis, the largest bone fragment had a maximum dimension of 42 mm, which is close to the average maximum fragment size reported by McKinley (1994b) for British cremation burials of 45 mm.…”
Section: The Broadway Cremation Burialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burial deposit was donated to the Lincolnshire Museum (now The Collection) in 1953 but appears not to have been recorded by publication. Several years later two late second to mid-third century cremations, interred in cooking pots, were found approximately 100 m away (Goodburn et al 1976), and a fragment of a Roman tombstone was later recovered very close to the previous finds (White 1977 The total weight of all the cremated materials in the Broadway burial was 376 g with the total weight of the cremated bone 371 g. The latter value is substantially below the expected weight of a modern adult cremation (approximately 1000-2400 g), but is within the observed range of Romano-British cremation burials (McKinley 1993(McKinley , 2004b. At the time of analysis, the largest bone fragment had a maximum dimension of 42 mm, which is close to the average maximum fragment size reported by McKinley (1994b) for British cremation burials of 45 mm.…”
Section: The Broadway Cremation Burialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between AD 250 and 270 a phase of newly built and expanded villas and farmsteads reflects a period of increased prosperity: substantial Roman stone-built farmsteads or villas are known at Bowcombe (Sydenham, 1945); Brading (Price and Price, 1881;1890); Carisbrooke (Spickernell, 1859;Rigold, 1969); Clatterford (Kell, 1856;Busby et al,. 2001); Combley (Sydenham, 1945;Fennelly, 1969Fennelly, , 1971; Gurnard (Kell, 1866); Rock (Goodburn et al, 1976;Tomalin, 2006) and Shide, at Newport (Sherwin, 1929;Stone, 1929). There is another possible villa site at Watergate Newport (Frere and Tomalin, 1991).…”
Section: Archaeological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project was under the overall direction of Jeffrey West, then the area's Inspector of Ancient Monuments, now English Heritage's regional director of Historic Properties (Midlands). For interim notes see Goodburn 1976, 337, Frere 1977, 400, and Goodburn 1978 century, based on pottery evidence from beneath the Period 1 bath-house and on the two-colour mosaics from the early west range buildings. Period 2 remains undated although a third-century rather than second-century date seems the more likely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%