2021
DOI: 10.15403/jgld-3297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romanian National Guideline on Translating Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Applications related to Clostridioides difficile Infections into the Local Clinical Practice

Abstract: Fecal microbiota transplantation involves the infusion of intestinal microorganisms via the transfer of a stool from a healthy individual into a diseased individual, with the intent of restoring normal intestinal flora. Fecal transplant is proposed for the treatment of refractory Clostridioides difficile infection. At present, recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection is the only indication supported by solid scientific evidence. Regulations by healthcare authorities vary among different countries. Consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(204 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MWP (N=185) across 17 countries, India (93), UK (29), EU (24), Japan (11), US (9), Canada (6), and others (13), responded to the survey. Respondents were highly qualified with 87% having an MS/PhD/equivalent degree and MWF experience of 0-5 (26%), >5-10 (29%), >10-15 (24%), and >15 years (21%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MWP (N=185) across 17 countries, India (93), UK (29), EU (24), Japan (11), US (9), Canada (6), and others (13), responded to the survey. Respondents were highly qualified with 87% having an MS/PhD/equivalent degree and MWF experience of 0-5 (26%), >5-10 (29%), >10-15 (24%), and >15 years (21%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarification of document distinctions is provided in Table 1. [2][3][4]12,13,[24][25][26][27] As an example of the differences in readability and target reading ages between lay summaries and PLS, selected excerpts 28,29 showed the readability consensus was 12-14 years old for the lay summaries and 18-19 years old for the PLS (Figure 1, 28 Figure 2 29 ).…”
Section: Document Distinctions and Example Readability Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Australia, Austria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] How ever, these guidelines are mostly an expert consensus of medical societies without the point of view of relevant regulatory authorities.…”
Section: Physicians' Approvalmentioning
confidence: 99%